In 6. What was the result of the U.S. going into California?

1 answer:

8 0

The Mexican government and Spanish-speaking Californians became increasingly suspicious of the motives of the "Americans" of the U.S.

You might be interested in

What set of laws were in response to the Boston Tea

nikitadnepr [17]

5 trust me my guy its 5

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Clan membership in most tribes was matrilineal, which meant it was based on a blood relationship with the father. Question 16 op

Serggg [28]

I think this question is true

4 0

3 years ago

One goal of the congress of Vienna was to?

ZanzabumX [31]

i believe it was to establish the concert of europe to ensure someone like Napoleon wouldn;t ever arise to power again

3 0

4 years ago

Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne in return for Text to speech

Katen [24]

Wait what’s option C

3 0

3 years ago

Select the correct text in the passage.

JulijaS [17]

This portion of the text shows Hobbes supported an absolute ruler:

Men are continually in competition for honour and dignity . . . and consequently amongst men there ariseth on that ground, envy, and hatred, and finally war. ... No wonder if there be somewhat else required, besides [contract], to make their agreement constant and lasting; which is a common power to keep them in awe and to direct their actions to the common benefit.
The only way to erect such a common power, as may be able to defend them from the invasion of foreigners, and the injuries of one another . . . is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men, that may reduce all their wills, by plurality of voices, unto one will.

Further detail:

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called Leviathan in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers