Answer:
Habeas corpus.
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation.
Therefore, when a judge with competent jurisdiction decides on an issue, his or her decision is final and can only be changed (upturned) by another court ruling.
This ultimately implies that, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
A legal order for an investigation into whether a person who is arrested has been imprisoned legally defines habeas corpus.
Additionally, habeas corpus ensures protection for an individual from imprisonment without being charged legally with a crime. The individual reports his or her illegal (unlawful) imprisonment or detention to a court in order to regain freedom.
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
D. a loose interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.
Explanation:
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1801 till his death in 1835. Without any prior study in law, he studied law in only just six weeks.
Under Supreme Court's decision under Chief Justice John Marshall upheld Alexander Hamilton's interpretation of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton advocated broad and liberal interpretation of the Constitution. This belief was upheld by the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall. The Supreme Court uphelded a loose and liberal interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Answer:when the verdict of a case is challenged and asked to be reviewed by a higher court it is called an appeal. The higher courts look for the evidence for the reason the defendant was guilty
Explanation:
<u>Embezzlement</u> is the theft or misuse of <u>company funds by executives </u>
Explanation:
<u>Embezzlement, refers to the act of withholding the assets of a company with the intention of conversion(theft) by one or more person to whom the assets where entrusted .It is a type of financial fraud</u>
