Answer:
Plessy v. Ferguson
Explanation:
The Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson formalized the legal principle of "separate but equal".
(G o o g l e) Is amazing, lol
_Government_
if this helped enough mark brainliest!
Answer:
If we examine democracy within a certain country, we can definitely conclude that people are able to participate within the government, whether it be directly, or indirectly (a republic). In each case, people are involved in the government, and the people that they choose to elect can affect the laws that are passed, the actions that are taken, etc.
Explanation:
Example: If I vote to elect someone I think would make a great president, I would want him to serve not only myself, but my country as well. In addition, the actions that president takes can have a critical effect on future events. In other words, the actions they do now, can have an effect on decisions in the future.
The correct answer is <span>George Washington. I believe you wanted to say primacy. The idea is that there should be a strong national government and it doesn't get any earlier than him since he was after all the first president of the United States. He didn't like the idea of parties because he believed they would split the people and the government.</span>
Possibly, though I can't really say.
