“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Hi there
This is a smart question :)
Anyway the correct answer is : D
I hope that's help:0 Please rate down here ↓↓
Taxation is one economic policy
For an individual to achieve goals associated with assets, such as a house and car, it is essential to have a budget plan for organizing finances.
<h3 /><h3>What is budgeting?</h3>
It corresponds to a tool for projecting financial resources inflows and outflows for certain objectives, which helps in the control and organization of expenses in a period.
Therefore, through personal budget planning, an individual achieves greater organization of their finances and control, achieving a balance between wants and needs.
Find out more about budgeting here:
brainly.com/question/6663636
#SPJ1
Answer:
You don't have to pay for the basic plan, which is what most people use, you just have to pay for premium which is an option, so i's technically free, maybe you chose to take the costly path.
