Generally speaking, under Akbar, the Mughal Empire supported "<span>D. Muslims and Christians," since Akbar was actually considered to be one of the most progressive rulers of his age when it came to religious freedom. </span>
Answer:
Linda Brown
Explanation:
In 1951, Oliver Brown sued the Board of Education of Topeka because his daughter Linda Brown was refused entry into Topeka all white school which was closer to their house, thus safer and more equipped. He sought for the separate but equal law instituted in 1896 to be made unconstitutional and for his daughter to be allowed to go to an all white school. In 1954, in a landmark verdict, the United States Supreme Court declared the separate but equal law unconstitutional as it contravenes the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.
Answer:
what happened
Explanation:
please explain what happened so i can help you
<span>It is said to be that force is directly correlation with acceleration.
F=axm
Example:
To solve this given word problem we can first identify the given and the apt formula to use in this phenomenon: Given: Force = 4, 500 N = 4, 500 kg-m/s^2 Acceleration = 5 m/s^2 </span>
<span>Formula: f=ma </span>
<span>Derivation: m = f/a </span>
<span>Solution: </span><span><span>
1. </span>M = f/a</span> <span><span>
2. </span>M = 4,500 kg-m/s^2 / 5 m/s^2</span> <span><span>
3. </span>M = 900 kg </span>
<span>Hence, the object’s mass is </span>900 kg.<span>
</span>
But the Bush camp argued that the resulting spectacle of county officials scrutinizing individual ballots—sometimes with a magnifying glass—to determine if the voter had attempted to make an impression on the ballot was a farce and should be ended. And on 12 December, the United States Supreme Court agreed. Of course, they did not put it quite that way. Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy argued that the current recount was not guided by a uniform standard and consequently threatened the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law. Two justices in the minority, Stephen Breyer and David Souter, also felt that the Florida Supreme Court's failure to establish a governing standard when they ordered the recount on 8 December was a problem—but their solution was to remand, or return, the case to the Florida court for clarification. But Kennedy and the others in the majority had no patience for this solution. They seem moved by the logic of Justice Antonin Scalia that extending the recount did "irreparable harm" to the apparent winner, George Bush, by "casting a cloud upon . . . the legitimacy of his election."<span>14</span>