2 years ago

Explain why solving a system of equations using graphing is not a useful solution technique?

1 answer:

5 0

Answer:

solving a system of equations using graphing is not a useful solution technique because you are plotting on a 2D surface. For example, if you graph the system below, you get the following graph. ... While you can approximate the solution to this system, you cannot say exactly where the intersection point is since it does not fall on integer values on the number lines.

You might be interested in

2x+5=11 two step equations<br>

Sati [7]

Answer:

x=3

Explanation: 11-5=6

6/2= 3

Plug 3 into the equation and you get 2x3+5=11 which 2x3=6 and 6+5=11

4 0

3 years ago

The second rate superhero and is Arch Enemy Melvin the minor menace started 700 miles apart and fleet street toward each other i

Papessa [141]

Answer:75 mph

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

C) Which of these numbers is a square number?

olasank [31]

Answer:

i think b

Step-by-step explanation:

9=3^2 and 10^4=(10^2)2

5 0

3 years ago

Provide a counterexample for the proposition: If n > 3 then n> 5.

MariettaO [177]

Answer:

Your answer would be C: 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Well, I mean, 4 is greater than 3, but is less than 5. Which proves the n > 5 part wrong.

3 0

3 years ago

An earthquake registered 7.4 on the Richter scale. If the reference intensity of this quake was 2.0 × 1011, what was its intensi

dexar [7]

32.0 you just add the first and last numbers then muptily the middle number by you anwser and divdie your 2 anwsers to gether

5 0

3 years ago

Explain why solving a system of equations using graphing is not a useful solution technique￼?

Explain why solving a system of equations using graphing is not a useful solution technique?