Answer: A summary could be followed by a Conclusion, at least it seems reasonable if you get up and have something to say, something of enough importance to convey, you certainly can summarize what you tried to get across, and lastly provide a conclusion to make the Speech and your point of giving it, (at last complete), with a Conclusion.
This is simply my opinion, and I am not referencing any “rule book”, just what I find to be reasonable.
A final Conclusion would by this time,
allow the listener to evaluate all the speaker had said and why. It would have a greater purpose beyond a mere exercise.
This is, again, simply my view on the question and a proposed answer.
Explanation:
external conflict is a type of conflict that occurs when an outside force such as a person vs person, object, animal, nature, etc brings conflicts, as opposed to internal conflict, which is a conflict between oneself, example: person vs. self.
The word truth is a(n) obvious and accepted fact.
Answer:
The speaker in “in Just-” employs language that is upbeat and positive to match his own perspective, while the speaker in "July” uses more negative language to show his disapproval.
Explanation:
Took the test