Most likely the fact that there military was severely restricted to a mere 100,000 soldiers. They were also forced to pay for the entirety of damages caused during world war 1. France also got possession of the Rhineland which was the main mining region where Germany got money from, happened it was almost impossible for them to pay off the debts.
You'll have to consider for yourself what your own thoughts are, but some of the issues were these:
The United States saw the use of the atomic bombs as a way to bring the war to an end in a way that would cost less American lives. A land invasion of Japan would have meant many American soldiers being killed in battle. However, the cost in Japanese lives was enormous by the use of the bombs, and that was not given equal consideration.
Another consideration was that the United States had been engaging in a fire-bombing campaign of Japanese cities prior to the use of atomic bombs. The fire-bombing campaigns were horrifically destructive also, but did not have the radiation after-effects of atomic bombings.
An option that could have been used rather than dropping atomic bombs was to enlist Soviet troops in a joint invasion of Japan. But the USA wanted to avoid postwar Soviet presence in Japan, and the atomic bombs were seen as a way of ending the war quickly. You can consider whether it would have been a more "moral" way of pursuing war to conduct a land invasion with Soviet assistance.
Finally, the escalation to the point of using atomic bombs was, in part, due to the Allies' insistence on an "unconditional surrender" by Japan. A second bomb was dropped at Nagasaki after the first was dropped on Hiroshima, because Japan did not submit to unconditional surrender in the immediate aftermath of the Hiroshima bombing. You can consider for yourself whether some other resolution besides "unconditional surrender" was a viable option for ending the war with Japan.
Answer:
I believe is because they were not unsatisfied with Great Britain and it's acts on the Colony.
Explanation:
When we analyze the American Revolution and look at each side, it's common to interpret their relationship based on the concept of good against evil, or good actions and bad actions. However, we forget that the war was fought by common people, with their motivations. And that's the case of Loyalists. <em><u>They were not unsatisfied with Great Britain</u></em>, maybe <em><u>because they were wealthy enough; or because they believed that Great Britain's actions were normal. </u></em>Or because they didn't believed that the <u><em>fight against England was not only unnecessary but wrong.</em></u>
The growth of industries in America started in the earlier 1800s and continued all through to the civil wars. After the war was over, the industries in America had become small, and labor remained widely but limited the production of more products.
Many businesses operated in small companies because lacked enough capital to expand. The American industry changed drastically after the war due to the introduction of machines that replaced manual labor, thus increase production. Investors also improved and expanded their operations.
