The detail from the excerpt that best supports the claim that it is impossible to change the justice system without changing policing is D) “So law enforcement is in the position to be at the very front of the continuum, so responsibility rests with law enforcement, certainly to start that process.”
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
It should be noted that a claim simply means the stance or the perspective of an author regarding a particular issue or topic.
From the information, it was stated that "Let’s prevent as much as we can, but let us go back and correct when we need to.” The last thing and fairly obvious was, the justice system begins with law enforcement"
Therefore, the detail from the excerpt that best supports the claim that it is impossible to change the justice system without changing policing is “So law enforcement is in the position to be at the very front of the continuum, so responsibility rests with law enforcement, certainly to start that process.”
Learn more about claim on:
brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Answer:
Vested with sufficient powers
Explanation:
Jay uses the phrase <em>vested with sufficient powers</em><em> </em>to describe the American government (... <em>united under one </em><em><u>federal government</u></em><em>, </em><em>vested with sufficient powers</em>...).
The phrase <em>intelligent and well-informed</em> describes Americans. The phrases <em>uniformly entertained</em> and <em>erroneous opinion</em> are not used to describe other words.
It is defining.
Defining relative clause does not have a comma, while a non-defining relative clause has.
For example, if the sentence is:
The children, who hate chocolates, are uncommon.
- since there is comma in this sentence, it is non-defining.
- while if there is no comma like the question in the picture, it is defining.
Is this a question???????
