1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irga5000 [103]
3 years ago
11

Was Andrew Jackson a great president? Opinions are mixed. What is yours? Consider the words that Jackson biographer James Parton

wrote in 1859: "Andrew Jackson, I am given to understand, was a patriot and a traitor. He was one of the greatest of generals, and wholly ignorant of the art of war... He was tbe most candid of men. and was capable of the profoundest dissimulation... A democratic autocrat [ dictator]. An urbane [ sophisticated] savage. An atrocious [ awful] saint." (Now write a well-constructed essay of your own about the quality of the Jackson presidency. Be sure to start with a clear thesis statement and then give specific examples of events and issues to support your position). ( Please do not repost someone else's answer that is on brainly or any other websites down for my answer please). ( PLEASE ACTUALLY FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AND YOU'LL GET BRAINLIEST).​
History
1 answer:
lakkis [162]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

well i did my best hopely its not rong

You might be interested in
Why did U.S want to end WWII as quickly as possible?
almond37 [142]

Answer:

Ending the war as quickly as possible was seen as a positive because it ended the brutal fighting that had devastated so many. The second reason why some were in favor of the use of the atomic bombs was that it potentially saved the lives of millions of people.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How does the judicial branch function to review and evaluate laws and interpret the constitution
Zarrin [17]
The Judicial Branch uses judicial review to evaluate Acts of Congress and <span>Presidential Executive Orders to determine if they adhere to constitutional</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What is the main way a representative democracy differs from a direct democracy?
frutty [35]

Answer:

The answer should be A.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What impact did the thirty years war have on the german states
Semmy [17]
Germany was left divided into more that 360 states
3 0
3 years ago
Pretend that you are a newspaper reporter from the North traveling to the South&gt;Write a newspaper article to inform your Nort
swat32

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

This would be the title of the article:

"Indeed we are different. They vs. Us."

It is not easy to understand the fact that if we are all called Americans, why are we so different?

The country is the United States. But we are not United, and the states are confrontational.

Without a doubt, the North is so different than the South, and this is hurting and dividing the nation.

I am arriving from the South. What an interesting trip to that region. It opened my eyes. We are one nation, clearly divided into two. We, the northerners. They, the southerners.

Sectionalism is one factor that has influenced this separation. I realized there are some reasons that have caused this sectionalism. Of course, slavery, economic differences, culture, and legislation.

The cultural differences are remarkable and you can see them reflected in society.

Here, in the North, we are more urbanized. There is a lot of industry and urbanization is the result of better infrastructure. Although low-paid jobs are offered in industries, at least there are jobs for everyone. That is not the case in the South. They depend totally on slaves. Most people live from agriculture, growing cash crops. For them to be successful, they need slaves.

Religion is not a major issue in the North. We have faith in God and try to be good citizens. In the South, religious fervor is notorious.

Education is another factor that separates us from the South. The school system is different and there are more schools here in the North.

Finally, politics and legislation. The North is not segregationist. On the contrary, we oppose slavery. We think the new states should be "free states." The southerners think the opposite, new states should be "slave states."

Is there any short-term solution to decently resolve our disputes and differences?

I don't see any coming.

Maybe, it is just a matter of time.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to Bolívar, what is the advantage of a hereditary senate?
    12·2 answers
  • 2. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction?
    15·2 answers
  • Nationalist movements in the ottoman empire resulted in growth and a stronger empire. independence or self-rule for many territo
    7·2 answers
  • What is the function of an intermediate appellate​ court?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes a similarity between the German US responses in the later stages of the Great Depression
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements are true about the actions JFK took in regard to Vietnam?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the strengths and weaknesses of the<br> Ottoman Empire?
    13·1 answer
  • 1) According to the Mandate of Heaven, when can people overthrow the emperor?
    15·2 answers
  • What did Lenin declare how did he surprised his antagonist​
    12·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of segregation?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!