1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina86 [1]
3 years ago
10

PLEASE, PLEASE HELP!!!!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, THANK YOU, AND 5-STAR RATING!!!!!!!!!!

History
1 answer:
Paul [167]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

During the reign of Philip II, Spain reached the height of its influence and power, and remained firmly Roman Catholic. Philip saw himself as a champion of Catholicism, both against the Muslim Ottoman Empire and the Protestants.

As the Spanish Empire was not a single monarchy with one legal system but a federation of separate realms, Philip often found his authority overruled by local assemblies, and his word less effective than that of local lords.

When Philip’s health began failing, he worked from his quarters in the Palace-Monastery-Pantheon of El Escorial, which he built with Juan Batista de Toledo and which was another expression of Philip’s commitments to protect Catholics against the raising influence of Protestantism across Europe.

Philip’s foreign policies were determined by a combination of Catholic fervor and dynastic objectives. He considered himself the chief defender of Catholic Europe, both against the Ottoman Turks and against the forces of the Protestant Reformation.

Wars with Dutch Provinces, England, France, and the Ottoman Empire all had the undermining religious aspects of protecting Catholicism in increasingly Protestant Europe or protecting Christianity against Islam.

Because Philip II was the most powerful European monarch in an era of war and religious conflict, evaluating both his reign and the man himself has become a controversial historical subject.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When evaluating past eras, historians depend on primary documents and other resources to understand events and cultures. For ins
yKpoI14uk [10]
Primary sources are important sources of unbiased historical information, and they represent the correct form and order of historical facts.  primary sources such as manuscripts, letters and books such as history of Trismengitus serves to inform how the society have evolved over generations while at the same time maintaining a cause-effect correlation.
8 0
3 years ago
In the united states, there was a marked increase in political drama during which period?
valentinak56 [21]

In the united states, there was a marked increase in political drama during the period of d)Vietnam War.

The U.S. entered the Vietnam War in try to save the unfolding of communism, but foreign coverage, economic pursuits, countrywide fears, and geopolitical techniques additionally performed essential roles. analyze why a country that was slightly known to maximum Americans got here to define a generation.

There had been a couple of motives for this. First, the Americans have been an invading force, and the Vietnamese have been combating on their very own soil. 2d, the people had been no longer willing to make an all-out commitment to winning.

The Vietnam War turned into a struggle in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia from 1 November 1955 to the autumn of Saigon on 30 April 1975. It became the second one of the Indochina Wars and become officially fought between North Vietnam and South Vietnam.

Disclaimer: The question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.

Question: In the United States, there was a marked increase in political drama during which period?

a)Revolutionary War

b)Civil War

c)World War II

d)Vietnam War

Learn  more about Vietnam War here brainly.com/question/182779

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
?
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

It wont let me

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Hitler's power in Europe was seriously checked when the United States entered the war. TRUE. User: who led the Communist forces
dem82 [27]
Hitler's power was not checked when the US entered the war. The war with the US was between them and Japan. The USSR did join sides with the allies when Germany broke an treaty. However, the US did win the war between Japan.
5 0
3 years ago
How was the Boston Massacre the colonist fault?
Nata [24]

The Boston massacre was partially the colonists fault because they were harassing the British soldiers by throwing, sticks, rocks and snowballs at them. The soldiers panicked and many accounts say that they heard someone yell fire.

Hope this helped! If you have any questions please ask!

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The early English prison reformer who called for more sanitary and secure prisons was__________
    5·2 answers
  • Identify whether the following views about war belonged to the Spanish conquistadores or the Aztec. fought wars primarily to tak
    9·2 answers
  • Is there a society in a golden age today?<br>I tried to find it on google but.........nope.
    11·2 answers
  • Consider that President Roosevelet delivered the Four Freedoms speech on January 6, 1941. What is the historical context of this
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the Civil War is FALSE?
    9·2 answers
  • What kinds of goods did the Aztecs receive in tribute from conquered people?
    15·2 answers
  • Identify the goals of the Union and the Confederacy in the Civil War.
    15·1 answer
  • Explique, porque es importante tener presente en la vida de cada Uno, los valores que desdela infancianos han enseñado en el hog
    12·1 answer
  • Help ASAP.. Brainliest + Thanks
    7·1 answer
  • What happens during a period of inflation?<br> Do not look for the answer from the web please.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!