U didn’t show the scatter diagram lol
When a transversal cuts (or intersects) parallel lines several pairs of congruent and supplementary angles are formed.
If you would like to find the product (n + 8) * (n - 2), you can do this using the following steps:
(n + 8) * (n - 2) = n * n - 2 * n + 8 * n - 8 * 2 = n^2 + 6 * n - 16
The correct result would be n^2 + 6 * n - 16.
The null hypothesis is p = 0.68 while the alternative hypothesis will be that it's below that is p < 0.68.
First, let us understand the Null and Alternative hypotheses:
The null hypothesis is simply to predict that there is no effect of the relationship between the variables.
The alternative hypothesis is to state the research prediction of a relationship or effect. In this case, the newsletter publisher believes that below 68% of their readers own a Rolls Royce.
The null hypothesis is that the proportion of readers who own a Rolls Royce is equal to 0.68.
Null hypotheses = H₀: p = 0.68
The alternate hypothesis is that the proportion of readers who own a Rolls Royce is below 0.68.
Alternate hypotheses = H₁: p < 0.68.
Thus, the null hypothesis is p = 0.68 while the alternative hypothesis will be that it's below that is p < 0.68.
To learn more about the Null and Alternative hypotheses visit:
brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ9
Answer:
y > 11/2
Step-by-step explanation:
This is solved the same way a 3-step equation is solved.
<u>Step 1</u>: subtract the smaller variable term from both sides.
4y -2y +3 > 2y -2y +14
2y +3 > 14
<u>Step 2</u>: subtract the constant with the variable term.
2y +3 -3 > 14 -3
2y > 11
<u>Step 3</u>: divide by the coefficient of the variable.
2y/2 > 11/2
y > 11/2
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
By choosing to subtract the smaller variable term in the first step (regardless of which side of the inequality it is on), we ensure that the remaining variable coefficient is positive. That means we can do step 3 without worrying about changing the direction of the inequality symbol, because we're dividing by a positive number.
