All categories

2 years ago

Was the claim of Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company, correct? Why

1 answer:

5 0

Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are not correct, as the exclusivity contract that Koko Marius signed was not yet over.

You did not show the text to which this question refers, but through questions similar to yours, we can see that this question refers to the text presented in the figure below.

We can arrive at this answer because:

Koko Marius signed the exclusive contract with the JiMing Company of his own free will.
This contract required the exclusivity of one year of work, which is a rational and legal period.
In this case, Koko Marius cannot justify breaking the contract because he was seeking professional growth, as he could legally do so after a short period.

In this case, we can affirm that Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are incorrect regarding the breach of contract, since, under the law, this breach of contract was illegal.

More information:

brainly.com/question/12790234?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in

Which word in the following sentence is the direct object? Scott and Maria played soccer with an old ball they found behind the

Advocard [28]

A direct object is usually after the verb. In this case the verb is played, so the direct object would be B. Soccer

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

He looked like a man cut away from the stake, when the fire has overrunningly wasted all the limbs without consuming them, or ta

Anna35 [415]

Answer:

Explanation:

The narrator talks about how the fire wasting a man that was tied to a stake. Assuming that the fire is symbolic for fate, it makes sense for this passage to describe parraylissis. Especially when looking in the context of the last sentence, describing the man as a "unalterable mold" "made of solid bronze" someone who is unaltered is unable to move, and solid bronze is unmovable by human hands after a certain amount is gathered. I was debating between A and D though, so I'll tell you why I didn't pick D. d refers to nature and mans lack of ability to change it, however where nature is involved in the passage (fire) the man doesn't try to shape or change it, it changes the man.

4 0

3 years ago

Which line from the text most clearly establishes the setting?

Anika [276]

The line from the text most clearly establishes the setting is "Justin was riding with Becky so she could take her driving test," as stated in option B.

<h3>What is setting?</h3>

When it comes to literature, we can define setting as the when and where of the story, that is, the context surrounding the characters and the events in the story.

Among the given options, the one that most clearly establishes the setting is option B. Here, the author gives us information about the context:

Justin and Becky are in a car.

They are riding together.

Becky is practicing for her driving test.

Therefore, we can choose option B as the correct answer for this question.

Learn more about setting here:

brainly.com/question/5660357

#SPJ1

7 0

2 years ago

Which word most likely means a timepiece fitted with a recording device that marks down exact intervals of time?.

Nitella [24]

Answer:

a stopwatch probably

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Would you expect to suffer negative consequences if you did not study for a test? Explain.

creativ13 [48]

Answer:

yes, I would be in trouble and probably fail in school.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers