Answer:
Cons for supporting Ukraine is that a world war three will occur no matter what
Multiple deaths
Trade is gonna be affected between the U.S and other countries
Pros
Is that NATO would probably come in to help Ukraine
Which could end the war
Since putin didnt want Ukraine to join
Explanation:
Answers:
- E) Post Hoc
- B) Slippery slope
- D) Popularity
- C) Fear
- A) False Dichotomy
===================================================
Explanations:
Part 1
The term "post hoc" has the longer name "post hoc ergo propter hoc". It's a Latin phrase that translates to "after this, therefore because of this". An example of a fallacy like is: "I turned on the sprinklers, then it started to rain outside. Therefore I caused it to rain". Clearly the sprinklers have no connection to the clouds on whether they release water or not. It was simply a coincidence the two events happened together like that.
------------------
Part 2
A slippery slope is when you start with one premise and then work your way in a chain reaction through more events. Those events may be directly connected or very loosely indirectly connected. Also, these events tend to get worse and worse as time goes on. An example of this would be a Direct TV ad that has this script "if the cable goes out, you get stressed. If you get stressed, you go on vacation. If you go on vacation, you get bitten by something exotic and your face swells up. Don't let your face swell up and ditch cable". I'm paraphrasing the ad. But the idea is that the fact the cable goes out leads to the person's face being swollen.
------------------
Part 3
The term "bandwagon fallacy" is also applicable here. Just because everyone says something is true doesn't always make it so. During the medieval period, people thought the sun revolved around the earth, but instead it's the other way around. So if someone said "the sun revolves around the earth because everyone else agrees", then they would be using a bandwagon fallacy. You would need to go out and do scientific studies and observations to prove the claim.
------------------
Part 4
Fear is a good motivator, as well as appealing to anger as well. Strong emotions like this tend to connect with people. It's likely due to just how people's brains are wired. There may be more factors as well. An example would be "vote for me or else my opponent will start another foreign war".
------------------
Part 5
A dichotomy is the idea of having 2 choices only. For example, a coin flip has 2 sides it could land on. A false dichotomy is where the person introduces only two choices for the audience to pick. This gives the audience some sense of interaction and choice. However, false dichotomy arguments tend to make one choice a very bad one while the other choice is either good or tolerable.
An example of this would be any time a political leader states "You're either with us or you're against us" usually when it involves some lead up to a war, or a war is already going on. The two sides "with us" and "against us" aren't the only possible options. It's possible to be neutral and not to be involved at all.
Answer:
Learning is discovering new things or ideas and even sharing ones knowledge , Without learning the world would be freeze. Not able to stop global warming because you don't know how it affects the earth etc. We would still be living like stone age persons. Secondly, Without learning we would make the same mistakes over and over again until we die because we wouldn't learn from it.
Answer:
I believe it is: Li's speech is more effective because it uses visuals of maps and timelines.
Explanation:
Li gave evidence of freedom. While Jackie just repeated phrases over and over again. Jackie's Speech could've sounded like this:
"Freedom is good. Freedom gives people opportunities. Freedom is good because it gives people opportunities. Freedom makes people happy. Freedom is good to make people happy."
Do you see how boring that is? Jackie is just repeating over and over again that "freedom is good."
On the other hand, Li could have something like this: (Please note I just made up the dates to state my point)
"Back in 1745, slaves were kept as.. well slaves. It was not right. So Abraham Lincoln decided to free them. (Here Li would show a graph of how happy the African Americans became after they were free.) Do you see how the happy bar increased?"
Li's speech is waaay more interesting. I hope I have helped! :)
