Answer:
Monarchies
<h2>
Why has monarchy gone into such precipitous decline over the last few centuries?</h2>
A rather rigorous class system must be recognized by the entire country for a monarchy to survive. The overwhelming majority of people must genuinely think that there is a class system and that those at the top are superior to those at the bottom. There shouldn't be upward mobility; some individuals should be born into working-class poverty while others should be born to inherit titles and rule over the working class. The Monarch, who is superior to everyone, is seated at the highest pinnacle of this structure.
A strict, universally embraced religious belief is added to this class structure. The Monarch reigned because God had given them the right to do so.
Societies have evolved over time to become more secular and egalitarian. People no longer think that someone with a title should have any privileges, thanks to industries like athletics, acting, music, comedy, etc. that allow someone from a working-class background to become quite affluent. In England, a person from a middle class family—with a teacher and a hairdresser as parents—can become a multimillionaire and knight by just fronting a rock and roll band and earning a knighthood.
In the meantime, religious belief has been slowly declining, and people no longer think a monarch was chosen by God.
In general, civilization has advanced past the point where a monarchy is justified. We are now adults. We think "that makes no sense at all" when we see someone in a position of power and influence only because of who their mother believes their father was. And we are correct.
He was the third president
he was a grand father of 12 grandchildren
he was an early archaeologist.<span>
</span>he kept pet mockingbirds.
<span>author of the Declaration of Independence
</span><span>he loved vanilla ice cream.
</span><span>he loved to write letters and read books.
</span>he went on a hungry strike and encouraged others to join him.
he was a family man.
he is remembered by putting him in<span> immortalized on the $2 bill, the nickel and as one of the figures of Mount Rushmore. </span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The country of France was made weaker by the Congress of Vienna’s work.
At the end of the Napoleonic wars, European countries such as Great Britain, Austria, Prussia, and even Russia, met to rearrenge the continent after the war. They organized the Congress of Viena to reestablish some monarchies that Napoleon had overthrown. They worked from 1814 to 1815 and these nations could establish a relative peace that lasted until some years before World War I.
Answer: The challenges of immigration are, more often than not, negotiated in the context of the family (Carranza 2001). Therefore, research in family studies needs to encompass the family as a unit of analysis as well as the patterns of resistance that family members develop in order to bounce back in an unwelcoming environment.
Explanation: A purposive sample was chosen in order to provide some diversity to the range of the accounts regarding mother–daughter negotiation. The purposive sample provided richness along many dimensions such as socio-economic-political religious affiliations, migration paths, etc. The sample design was fairly complex involving two sets of participants. Each of the two sets included mothers and their daughters. Participants in these sets were interviewed individually.These two sets were: (i) The Mother–Adolescent
Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adolescent daughters between the ages of 15 and 17 years who were born in Canada or abroad; and (ii) The Mother–Adult Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adult daughters between the ages of 19 and 30 years who grew up in Canada or arrived before becoming an adolescent. Mothers and daughters in these two groups were interviewed individually because ‘in-depth interviews provided the possibility to learn to see the world from the eyes of the person being interviewed’ (Ely 1991, p. 58). These in-depth conversations allowed obtaining information about the participants’ individual perceptions regarding their positioning as they settled into Canadian context.
To learn more about racism and immigration refer:-
brainly.com/question/8308669?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ2
