Answer:
Have you noticed on Saturdays in the park a lot of people are feeding birds? Birds can be so graceful and charming part of nature. Many people believed that they are helping the birds when they feed the birds. To feed the birds you have to do it year round. The birds also need a nest or ether a shelter to stay in. Even though all of these things are good the bad things about feeding birds are more plentiful than the good things about feeding the birds. The bird community may never be the same.
Birds have to migrate every year. The bad thing when you feed them is when they migrate they will have forgotten how to find food for themselves. That is because they have depended on the human to feed them for so long. The people are taking the natural part of the birds out of the birds and completely changing their personality. The birds are losing the wild side of them and they are getting too close to humans. The birds are also becoming aggressive to be able to get the food. Before long all of the birds will not know how to do anything on their own and they will depend on the humans for everything such as shelter and food. In the passage, it states, "Wild birds can become dependent on the hideouts." Also, it states, "When this happens, their behaviors change." This means that the birds are mainly having the wild part of them taken out to where they are just as human-friendly as they can be.
The birds are gong from natural free and in the wild birds to pets that can hardly do anything for themselves. Another thing is there are natural feeding sites all over the world for the birds, but that causes the wild ones that can fend for themselves to go to them and then the next thing you know there is not enough room for the birds that cant fend for themselves. The people are getting to where instead of seeing the birds in their natural habitat where nothing is harmed to where they want to have artificial one put up. The artificial bird sites are not only good for the people but they are also hurting the birds in many ways. In the passage, it states, "They can still visit sites where these birds nest
Explanation:
<h2>Follow instagrm at --> mvnnyvibes</h2>
John Brown was an American abolitionist who advocated insurrection as a means to end slavery in the United States. For his activities outside the law, Brown was accused of treason against the Commonwealth of Virginia, found guilty and hanged.
Prior to his death and after his sentencing, a large number of prominent figures raised money and wrote speeches in his defense. One of this people was Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson presented Brown as a common, everyday man who had strong ideals and felt compelled to act upon them. This was intended to present Brown as an admirable man and to invoke sympathy among the people by identifying themselves with him.
She admitted to following the ladies.
Only two of the four sentences contain a direct address. A direct address exists when someone addresses someone directly, meaning speaks to them by name. In (A), Walt is being addressed. In (C), Denise is being addressed. Direct addresses are always set off (separated from the other words) by commas. If the direct address is the first word in a sentence, it is followed by a comma. If the direct address is the last word in a sentence, it is immediately preceded by a comma. If the direct address appears elsewhere in the sentence, it is sandwiched between commas. For example, "I was wondering, David, if you'd mind helping at the event?" By the way, when a title or endearment functions in a sentence as a name, it is also considered a direct address: "If you don't let me go to the party, Mom, I'll never speak to you again." In your problem, (C) contains the direct address that is punctuated properly because Denise is followed by a comma.
