1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rewona [7]
3 years ago
11

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE ANSWER!!!!!

Law
1 answer:
Anton [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Over the years, justices have given many reasons for banning cameras. Among them: the Court needs to preserve its tradition; people will not understand the function of oral arguments; the media will use embarrassing sound bites; and cameras will encourage showboating.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In trial for homicide, a conviction cannot be had the body of the victim has been found.
stellarik [79]

Answer:

If this is a true or false question then the answer is false

there are many ways a trial can still be had; here is one example...

Explanation:

A murder conviction without a body is an instance of a person being convicted of murder despite the absence of the victim's body. Circumstantial and forensic evidence are prominent in such convictions. ... In all cases, unless otherwise noted, the remains of the victims were never recovered.

hope this helps :)

may I get brainliest please?

3 0
4 years ago
Please help ASAP !
Anna [14]

Answer:

limited government I think

6 0
3 years ago
With what one problem of law enforcement are you most fascinated with? why do you think you are so intrigued by it? I need help
matrenka [14]

Answer:b

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 4 of 10
Vladimir [108]

Answer: By donating the assets in-kind to the CRT, you'll preserve the full fair market value of the assets rather than reduce it by large capital gains taxes, allowing more money for the income and charitable beneficiaries.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Regional courts were set up for the united states with the
Viktor [21]

Answer:

Judiciary Act 1801

Explanation:

The judiciary act of 1801 which was overturned by the Jeffersonian republicans were part of the politically-motivated attempt made by the federalists in the U.S congress and the administration of John Adams to fill the federal courts with federalists.  Federal courts were used as political means to persecute those who criticized the actions of the federalists and a strong political opposition came into place by Thomas Jefferson, and his team helped in passing the Federal Judiciary act of 1801.  

The number of Supreme Court judges was reduced from six to five by the act and the act also created six new federal circuit courts in different region of the United States of America.  

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where is leader is called the “speaker”
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement describes Max Weber's theory about power?
    12·2 answers
  • The labor contact is valid for six months Even after it's expiry date true or false​
    5·1 answer
  • Why is the supremacy clause considered to be the root of federalism?
    14·2 answers
  • 1. Why should persons accused of crimes be<br> informed of their rights when they are<br> arrested?
    15·2 answers
  • Is a written set of instructions that tells a bank how to use money to pay someone.
    15·2 answers
  • What is special crime investigation​
    8·2 answers
  • In general, how has the power of the federal and the state governments changed over the course of the country's
    12·1 answer
  • Franz Joseph Gull suggested that a person's what could predict their criminal tendencies?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following will involve a lawsuit?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!