Lysistrata, the representative of the women, argued that women and children are always at the receiving end whenever war ensues. She told the magistrate that men abandon their wives and children during war to pursue an unnecessary military career, which makes their wives and children to suffer severely.
They are persuasive arguments because she was able to convince the magistrate who in turn condemned the men for not adequately monitoring their wives.
Another type of love that was expressed in the play was Mania-obsessive love. This is evident from the fact that the women found it difficult to control themselves and had to go back to their men for sex.
Pragma- enduring love, was also another type of love expressed in the play because the men were very determined to continue sexual affairs with their wives despite continual denial.
The correct answer is "none of the above". Mark Twain's "War Prayer" poem stated that there is a part in people´s prayer which they implicitly wish for but do not mention, which is the desire of the destruction and suffering of their enemies. This poem was written as a response to the Spanish-American War.
What the poem emphasizes in are the consequences that result for nations submitted to conflicts, which are al the hardships the people are left with after the war is over.
Answer:
so there would be a lot of blood
Explanation:
<span>Combining nobles and knights must have created the lords. It couldn't have created the royals because knights weren't always of royal blood. It certainly couldn't have created the peasants as they already existed at a much lower status than either Knights or nobles who would not have moved down in status through combining. I don't think it is vassals because vassals were landholders who owed allegiance but again not all knights owned land so that rules them out. That leaves the group called "lords". Lords are still in existence today and people are still "nobles" and are still knighted by royalty. So that makes "Lords" the most correct answer.</span>
