What is the level of measurement for clothing sizes (small, medium, large, extra large)?

Social Studies

2 answers:

nekit [7.7K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

WINSTONCH [101]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The order of size is small, medium, large, extra large. But Small – Medium ≠ Large – Extra Large. There is no quantitative value associated with variables on this scale. Instead, it is a qualitative measurement scale.

You might be interested in

Which of these is one of the main parts of the federal bureaucracy?

Vikentia [17]

According to sources, the most probable answer to this query is B. Independent agenciesFederal bureaucracy is attained when several states of a country has a special autonomy to perform that's within their capacity. This includes the establishment of individual agencies across the states Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

NO F*%KING LINKS!!

vaieri [72.5K]

Explanation:

I know right!! its annoyinggg

6 0

3 years ago

A type of social unity in which members’ interdependence is based on specialized functions and statuses

Tcecarenko [31]

Its called organic solidarity.

6 0

3 years ago

Any four difference between stupa style and shikhar style

Alja [10]

Explanation:

Any four differences between stupa style and shikhar style are;

Stupa style are mainly a Buddhist style of architecture and Shikhar style are mainly style of architecture of hindu.
The stupa have single towering but shikhar style has many towering. 
Various Buddhist statues are kept in it where as various gods atatues are kept in shikhar style. 
Most Buddhist use it to meditate and perform religious performance whereas hindus use the shikhar style architecture for performing various religious performance.

hope it helps....

Respect Nepalese architecture.. and love it.

7 0

3 years ago

Do the economic benefits of free trade outweigh the social costs?

mamaluj [8]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

Do the economic benefits of free trade outweigh the social costs?

Not really, and it all depends on the perspective.

From the big companies and industrial side, free trade has been a success. Free trade has allowed thousands of companies to export their goods with cero import tariffs, benefiting the income. It has allowed multinational companies to go abroad and establishing branches in different parts of the world, basically in underdeveloped nations.

Once there, they paid very low salaries, much less than what they should have paid in their former countries, That is a reason why they moved to underdeveloped countries. So cheap labor is one reason. And other these multinational companies freely exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of that underdeveloped country.

Meanwhile, free trade makes rich people and corporations richer, and poor countries and poor people continue to be as poor as they have always been. No serious progress at all,

8 0

3 years ago