Joseph Goldhagens article on the holocaust. You could read a memoir of an SS officer called the death dealer the ss officer was the commander of aushwitz
Monet and Renoir painted together.
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
The correct answer is - D: Fertile Farmland.
The civilizations in South Asia, as well as their major cities, were always located at places that had an abundance of fertile farmland. This usually meant that the major cities were established in close proximity to the large rivers, as their valleys had a lot of fertile farmland.
The main reason why the major cities in this part of the world were built in areas with lot of fertile farmland is because the economy was based on the agriculture. Another reason was the large populations on small areas. So basically, lot of food needed to be produced in order for this societies to be able to survive, and if possible to trade some food for other goods that they didn't had.
Answer:
1. ACLU
2. Protecting Citizen's Rights
3. Opposes
Explanation:
