It is according to company policy
Explanation:
Can you please elaborate the question...it is like your are asking a economic question along with a math question
Answer:
The correct answer is A. As a result of 20th century Supreme Court rulings, symbolic political speech gained substantial protections from government regulations.
Explanation:
Symbolic speech is a term that describes communicative situations in which the message transmitted is not literally expressed by the interlocutor. This type of speech is covered by the First Amendment implicitly.
Rulings such as Tinker v. Des Moines, United States v. O'Brien, Texas v. Johnson, and Cohen v. California expanded the protection of this type of discourse, including it within the protections of the First Amendment to freedom of expression.
For example, in the case Texas v. Johnson, it was established that the burning of an American flag involved a case of symbolic speech, so it should not be subject to prohibition by any type of law.
<span>Supreme Court found Northern Securities had violated the Sherman Antitrust act and ordered the trust to be broken up</span>
Answer:
Facism
Explanation:
The Italian people wanted a unified Italian state under one banner and all ethnic Italians to be united
Answer:
I'm pretty sure A would be the proper answer.
