the choices are
A: A Stag, chased from his lair by the hounds, took refuge in a farmyard, and, entering a stable where a number of oxen were stalled, thrust himself under a pile of hay in a vacant stall, where he lay concealed, all but the tips of his horns.
B: in the course of the afternoon more than one of the farm-hands came in, to attend to the wants of the cattle, but not one of them noticed the presence of the Stag, who accordingly began to congratulate himself on his escape and to express his gratitude to the Oxen.
C:As he spoke, he seized an armful himself from the pile where the Stag lay concealed, and at once detected him.
D:Calling his men, he had him seized at once and killed for the table.
Answer:
2. Barney enjoyed his own independence
Explanation:
Free will does not include the choice to think
Explanation:
As a society with free will, we have the right to how we communicate and express our ideas with others. But the choice to think on whatever you want however you want does not matter if you have the free will or not. Even if the rights to communicate our ideals and beliefs with others might be taken away, our thought process will not change. The only way our thoughts can be governed by another is through psychological techniques like brainwashing. But, given normal circumstances, no matter what the outside world thinks, the choice to think is a given human right and no law can prove otherwise.
Answer:
Rights are natural and are endowed by the very nature of our existence. It then follows that we cannot be separated from them, they are inalienable. Rights can be abused, restricted in their use or made ineffective but they cannot be removed. A person can be punished for saying something unpopular but short of killing him that person can still say whatever he wants. Since a right is inalienable, it cannot be separated from a person that person cannot transfer it either. What would be the point after all since everyone is equally endowed with the same natural rights.
If that is understood then everything else conferred on us by society then should be recognized as privilege. The first right that applies to your question is the right to equitable treatment. Even the poorest has equal claim on services that are available. The second right in play here is the right to aquire property and to be secure in its ownership. When any outside force whether it is your neighbor or the government attempts to tresspass on your ownership of the property it is theft and a violation of the owner's rights.
To claim the poorest person has a right to services, equitable treatment sustains that right. But to claim that a person who cannot pay for that service but is entitled to it at another's expense is theft.
<h3>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> MARK</u><u> ME</u><u> BRAINLIEST</u></h3>
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
ircular reasoning is also known as circular questioning or circular hypothesis. It can be easy to spot because both sides of the argument are essentially making the same point. For example: You must obey the law, because it’s illegal to break the law. Harold’s new book is well written, because Harold is a wonderful writer.