1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adoni [48]
2 years ago
8

Ap environmental science!! Will mark brainliest if correct! 2 questions shown in pic

Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
bija089 [108]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

3 and 5

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How do you find average total cost
Fofino [41]
Average cost (AC), also known as average total cost (ATC), is the average cost per unit of output. To find it, divide the total cost (TC) by the quantity the firm is producing (Q).


Internet:)
5 0
3 years ago
The net force on a vehicle that is accelerating at a rate of 1.5m/s2 is 1,800 newtons. What is the mass of the vehicle to the ne
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

1200

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How does society devalue feminism
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Homemaking is the traditional “women’s work”: housekeeping, cooking, raising children, etc.  While feminists have fought for women to be able to do more than simply stay at home, the reality is that staying at home may well be the life that some women desire, a life that they choose.  When feminists allow for this work to be degraded, what in fact happens is that women’s work, and consequently women and their contributions to society, are devalued.

The primary reason why women’s work is devalued in our modern society is simple: homemaking is not classified as productive work, but rather as reproductive work.  Consequently, it is a non-income-generating activity, and in a society that bases value in terms of wages and cost-benefit analyses, it become impossible to adequately assign a value to this kind of work.  But that’s not to say it doesn’t have value.  On the contrary, homemaking still needs to occur regardless of whether or not both parents in a household are able to or choose to work because children still need to be raised and food still needs to be put on the table.  Regardless of whether or not homemaking generates income, it is incredibly important.

On top of that, when we degrade homemaking, we place a negative connotation on something that should be an option for women, if it’s financially feasible.  While it is true that many households require two incomes in order to sustain their desired lifestyles, the truth is that if a woman has the ability to stay home with the children, that should be an option she should be able to pursue without feeling like she HAS to be doing something more.  Even more importantly, degrading this work reinforces the idea that this work is undesirable, which adds to the struggle to gain gender equity with regards to homemaking: that is, men are less likely to want to take part in homemaking or to consider staying home with the kids, if this remains stigmatized or frowned upon by society.  Placing greater value on and a greater respect for domestic work is going to be an important part of improving this area of balance.  Feminists can’t keep acting like this work is not valuable and then insisting that men help out: we are sending mixed messages that are just getting muddled.

There’s another aspect of this worth considering: there are women who take on homemaking and care-giving jobs for income, and if we are going to advance their position in society, we need to accord greater respect for the work that they do and the contributions they make.  This is particularly important from the perspective of intersectionality, because women of color are more likely to take on jobs working in domestic labor, and they in turn become degraded or devalued when feminism insists that this kind of work is not valuable, or that they should be aspiring to more. 


Credit to my mom: https://theradicalidea.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/devaluing-womens-work-devaluing-women-a-feminist-per...

4 0
3 years ago
8.9 x 10^5 tons = ? Ounces
Alexandra [31]
I may be wrong, but this is what I did:
8.9 x 10^5 x 2000 (1 ton is 2000 lbs) x 16 (16 ounces in 1 pound)
=2.848 x 10^10
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!!
Fynjy0 [20]
The answer is a sheen e e
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The components of e-waste include
    9·1 answer
  • Unlike representative democracy, direct democracy relies on
    9·1 answer
  • 11. Hawthorne's reference to Lincoln as the man of men" (line 3)
    7·1 answer
  • ASAPP PLEASE!! 40 PTS FOR THIS QUESTION!!
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes why you need to establish goals for your program?      A. Goals help you understand what i
    7·1 answer
  • What are the three zones in the goods and services that organized crime offers?
    8·2 answers
  • There are two parts of the sewing machine that helps move the fabric along. What are they?
    14·1 answer
  • Is harvesting energy from the volcanos important?
    8·1 answer
  • Question
    8·1 answer
  • Boba or coffee answer now #cat
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!