All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
Answer:
In the late 1950s and early 1960s conservatives were widely dismissed as "kooks" and "crackpots" with no hope of winning political power. In 1950 the literary critic Lionel Trilling spoke for a generation of scholars and journalists when he wrote that "in the United States at this time liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition.... It is the plain fact [that] there are no conservative or reactionary ideas in general circulation" but only "irritable mental gestures which seem to resemble ideas." The historian Richard Hofstadter echoed Trilling's assessment, arguing that the right was not a serious, long-term political movement but rather a transitory phenomenon led by irrational, paranoid people who were angry at the changes taking place in America.
Explanation:
We started using electricity in everyday life as technology is omnipresent and also represents an important aspect of our life. We started driving cars as the technology has been developed in the 19th century. We've started 'living' online as we have embraced the existance of the internet.
Answer:
when Charles I raised an army against the wishes of Parliament, ostensibly to deal with a rebellion in Ireland
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
Anne Hutchinson, who is a very popular feminist, had a resistance movement for women. After noticing how males dominated religious leadership positions of her time, she gathered women together, challenged the male-dominated religious authorities, and preached that both men and women had equal rights and abilities to be in leadership positions and make positive impacts in religion and society.
In American history, whenever women’s voices are included, statistics and studies have shown that there are positive economic outcomes for the country; increasing the participation of women in politics has generally led to wider economic impacts. American history has proven that elected female officials mostly focus on health, civil rights, and education. Electing more female legislators in office increases the likelihood of resolving issues in these areas, and improving the economy. Female voices and legislators create policies that improve very important parts of the economy. In federal programs, congresswomen have delivered 9% more per annum to their home districts than their male counterparts and almost passed laws twice more. On the other hand, without women’s voices in the scheme of things, the above results would likely not have been achieved.