Answer:
D. No, since some theories better account for more important data than do others.
Explanation:
While it is true that total objectivity is impossible, and no theory can fully explain a phenomenon, some theories are better than others at explaining things (mostly because they are built on previous theories).
For example, Einstein's General Relativity is better at explaining the Universe than Newton's laws of general motion, or Copernicus' heliocentric view of the Universe, even while the three theories are an improvement over the Ptolemaic geocentric cosmology that dominated Western thought for millenia.
And while Einstein's theories are not perfect, adhering to Newton's or Copernicus' theory instead would be unscientific.
So, imagine you had some substance in a bowl. The bowl has a little wall going through the middle, with no openings or anything.
On one side of the wall, there are 100 molecules of the supstance. On the other, there are 10 molecules.
Now, imagine that you make an opening in that little wall that separates the substance into two parts.
Normally, the 100 molecules would start pouring into the part with 10 molecules, or “go down the concentration gradient”, which means going from the part with higher concentration into lower until they are equal.
Going /against/ the concentration gradient is just the opposite — if the 10 molecules went into the side with 100, which takes energy to do.
<span>A stronger central government was necessary to maintain order. C. The principles of government should be firm and unchangeable.</span>
To be honest the correct answer is Olaudah Equiano
Sijilmasa influenced the most by the egyptian culture. Answer;C
