All categories

2 years ago

Which statement is true about ∠1 and ∠2?

Mathematics

1 answer:

gavmur [86]2 years ago

5 0

Answer: Most likely A

Step-by-step explanation:

the reason I say its A is because of the face that congruent means in line not and straight. Though in your answer it shows that they are not alined so that leaves us with complemantary and the 2 complementary answer choices are

A & C but C is wrong because it say alternate which also means the that they would be 2 different angels so yeah I'm gonna go for A.

Good luck :)

You might be interested in

A zoologist is studying four very closely related feline species. She wishes to compare their gestation periods. An observationa

diamong [38]

Answer:

$p_v= 0.01$

Since the significance level is 0.05 we see that $pv$ so we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. And the best conclusion for this case would be:

b. at least some, but not all, of the gestation periods across all four species are the same

Because is only to identify if AT LEAST one mean is different, NOT to conclude that the all the means are different.

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) "is used to analyze the differences among group means in a sample".

The sum of squares "is the sum of the square of variation, where variation is defined as the spread between each individual value and the grand mean"

Solution to the problem

The hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{A}=\mu_{B}=\mu_{C}= \mu_D$

Alternative hypothesis: Not all the means are equal $\mu_{i}\neq \mu_{j}, i,j=A,B,C,D$

In order to find the mean square between treatments (MSTR), we need to find first the sum of squares and the degrees of freedom.

If we assume that we have $p=4$ groups and on each group from $j=1,\dots,p$ we have $n_j$ individuals on each group we can define the following formulas of variation:

$SS_{total}=\sum_{j=1}^p \sum_{i=1}^{n_j} (x_{ij}-\bar x)^2$

$SS_{between}=SS_{model}=\sum_{j=1}^p n_j (\bar x_{j}-\bar x)^2$

$SS_{within}=SS_{error}=\sum_{j=1}^p \sum_{i=1}^{n_j} (x_{ij}-\bar x_j)^2$

And we have this property

$SST=SS_{between}+SS_{within}$

And in order to test this hypothesis we need to ue an F statistic and for this case the p value calculated is

$p_v= 0.01$

Since the significance level is 0.05 we see that $pv$ so we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. And the best conclusion for this case would be:

b. at least some, but not all, of the gestation periods across all four species are the same

Because is only to identify if AT LEAST one mean is different NOT to conclude that the all the means are different.

8 0

3 years ago

If the limit of f(x) as x approaches 8 is 3, can you conclude anything about f(8)?

natali 33 [55]

If the limit of f(x) as x approaches 8 is 3, can you conclude anything about f(8)? The answer is No. We cannot. See the explanation below.

<h3>What is the justification for the above position?</h3>

Again, 'No,' is the response to this question. The justification for this is that the value of a function does not depend on the function's limit at a given moment.

This is particularly clear when we consider a question with a gap. A rational function with a hole is an excellent example that will help you answer this question.

The limit of a function at a position where there is a hole in the function will exist, but the value of the function will not.

<h3>What is limit in Math?</h3>

A limit is the result that a function (or sequence) approaches when the input (or index) near some value in mathematics.

Limits are used to set continuity, derivatives, and integrals in calculus and mathematical analysis.

Learn more about limits:
brainly.com/question/23935467
#SPJ4

6 0

2 years ago

Evaluate the integral e^xy w region d xy=1, xy=4, x/y=1, x/y=2

LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Make a change of coordinates:

$u(x,y)=xy$
$v(x,y)=\dfrac xy$

The Jacobian for this transformation is

$\mathbf J=\begin{bmatrix}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}&\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\\\\\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}&\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}y&x\\\\\dfrac1y&-\dfrac x{y^2}\end{bmatrix}$

and has a determinant of

$\det\mathbf J=-\dfrac{2x}y$

Note that we need to use the Jacobian in the other direction; that is, we've computed

$\mathbf J=\dfrac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}$

but we need the Jacobian determinant for the reverse transformation (from $(x,y)$ to $(u,v)$ . To do this, notice that

$\dfrac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(u,v)}=\dfrac1{\dfrac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}}=\dfrac1{\mathbf J}$

we need to take the reciprocal of the Jacobian above.

The integral then changes to

$\displaystyle\iint_{\mathcal W_{(x,y)}}e^{xy}\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy=\iint_{\mathcal W_{(u,v)}}\dfrac{e^u}{|\det\mathbf J|}\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv$
$=\displaystyle\frac12\int_{v=}^{v=}\int_{u=}^{u=}\frac{e^u}v\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv=\frac{(e^4-e)\ln2}2$

8 0

3 years ago

What’s a equivalent ratio

Leni [432]

Ratios that are equivalent to each other are considered equivalent ratios. For example, 2:6 is equal to 6:18

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is ((-2)?<br> -1<br> 1<br> 3

hram777 [196]

Answer:

might be 3