1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nadya [2.5K]
3 years ago
15

(MC)Which phrase summarizes the question before the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education (1954)?

History
1 answer:
expeople1 [14]3 years ago
3 0
Hello

Here something for help you to answer and for help you later may be.


Racial segregation in the public schools is unconstitutional, as a violation of the equal protection cause . Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka , 347 U.S 483 was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separated public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional. The decision overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson decision of 1896, which allowed state-sponsored segregation , insofar as it applied to public education. Handed down on may 17, 1954, The Warren Court’s unanimous decision stated that " separate educational facilities are inherently unequal " As a result, de jure racial segregation was ruled a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of The Fourteenth Amendment of The United States Constitution. This ruling paved the way for integration and was a major victory of the Civil Rights Movement, and a model for many future impact litigation cases.
However, the decision’s fourteen pages did not spell out any sort of method for ending racial segregation in schools , and the Court’s second decision in Brown II, 349 U.S 249 only ordered states to desegregate " with all deliberate speed "


Bye and don’t forget I’m proud of you!<33
You might be interested in
What was North America like before the discovery of American by Columbus in 1492 ​
zimovet [89]

Answer:

Explanation:

The death toll is as surprising as the size of the populations before Columbus. When Columbus landed, there were an estimated 25 million people living in Mexico. At the time, there were only 10 million people in Spain and Portugal. Central Mexico was more densely populated than China or India when Columbus arrived.

Hope this helped you!

6 0
3 years ago
What would often happen when an overseer or other white man killed a slave?
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

In 1860 it was calculated that about 88 per cent of America's slave-owners owned twenty slaves or less. However, large landowners would usually own well over 100 slaves and relied heavily on overseers to run their plantations. These overseers were under considerable pressure from the plantation owners to maximize profits. They did this by bullying the slaves into increasing productivity. The punishments used against slaves judged to be under-performing included the use of the cart-whip. Not surprisingly the mortality-rate amongst the slaves was high. Studies have shown that over a four-year period, up to 30 per cent of the slave population in America died.

Explanation:

sorry if this isnt the answer u r looking for and sorry if i put too much :(

7 0
3 years ago
As a result of the stamp act crisis, the prime issue for americans shifted to the question of
I am Lyosha [343]

The result and because of the stamp act crisis, it led Americans to focus on primary issues in which one of those issue that is being questioned by them is regarding to taxation in which it is being implemented without any discussion or representation regarding that matter.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the southeast asia treaty organization (seato?
Mashcka [7]
In September of 1954, the United States, France, Great Britain, New Zealand, Australia, the Philippines, Thailand and Pakistan formed the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization<span>, or SEATO. The purpose of the </span>organization<span> was to prevent communism from gaining ground in the region.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were some of the problems with what kind of government set up by the articles of confederation​
RoseWind [281]

The States within the US Could not agree over anything and no actual change could be created. In addition, the Central Government could not tax it's citizens. The Central Gov't in general was ineffective under the Articles of Confederation.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • true or false that Abington school district v. Schempp established that illegally seized evidence could not be used in court?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these people might have performed trephination in the Inca Empire?
    8·2 answers
  • Although the 2008 election has been called the Facebook election, most campaign dollars were spent on which type of traditional
    14·2 answers
  • What is meant by the term "the end of the Cold War"?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the citizens of the Roman Republic govern themselves?
    8·1 answer
  • Create a public good for school ? Keep in mind isn't not free and will be paid by tax payers.
    14·1 answer
  • Where are the 2018 winter olympics being held?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the main idea of the Ten Commandments
    10·1 answer
  • Which research question would be most affective?
    6·1 answer
  • What was Douglas Macarthur's role in ww2?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!