1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
levacccp [35]
3 years ago
6

Do maryland officers have to let victims know their rights

Law
1 answer:
zubka84 [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No. The police have no obligation to read you Miranda Rights just because they have arrested you. Further, a failure to read you Miranda Warnings does not make the arrest improper.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in
How did the early lawmakers end up creating an acceptable Constitution?
Ostrovityanka [42]
It was left in the hands of the executive branch to solve
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
OH SHOOT FREE BRAINLIEST!! JUST COMMENT + 50 EXTRA POINTS
3241004551 [841]

Answer:

you mean BRAINLESS

Explanation:

I HAVE NO BRAIN

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the ___________ doctrine, officers are permitted to search and to seize evidence, without a warrant, on private pro
Salsk061 [2.6K]

The open field doctrine states that officers are allowed to search and take evidence on private property outside of the immediate vicinity of a dwelling without obtaining a warrant.

- A "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, according to the open-fields doctrine (also known as the open-field doctrine or open-fields rule) in American criminal procedural law.

- Explains that as long as objects are immediately recognizable as being subject to seizure and are within the sight of an officer who is legally present in the location from where the view is made, they may be properly confiscated without a warrant (illegal).  

To know more about doctrine, kindly click on the link below :

brainly.com/question/11271619?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

   

7 0
1 year ago
Jackson files a suit against Lance. Before going to trial, the parties, with their attorneys, meet to try to resolve their dispu
Elanso [62]

Answer:

This is a process called mediation which is a procedure in which the parties discuss their disputes with the assistance of a trained impartial third person(s) who assists them in reaching a settlement. The parties will fashion the solution as the mediator moves through the process.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Should the president be able to ratify or veto the law? Is that too much power?​
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

The president should be able to do that because if he didn't our world today would be so messed up. We wouldn't have any laws. Also that is not too much power.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Most of the first State constitutions were based on
    12·1 answer
  • Which best describes the basis for the right to privacy in the United States?
    9·2 answers
  • How would you compare and constrast the theories of Locke and montesquieu
    9·1 answer
  • Which one is not a type of danger with law enforcement?
    15·1 answer
  • What are some eco-friendly features my look for while shopping for your first vehicle?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was the first Postmaster General?
    10·1 answer
  • After a long school day, Brianna gets on her bike to ride home. She does not have her helmet on because she forgot to bring it w
    6·2 answers
  • 2. Your little Tommy wants a slingshot for his birthday, but you shouldn’t give him one. If you do, next he’ll want a B-B gun. T
    5·2 answers
  • Brainliest! Please help
    9·2 answers
  • 21. What % of all fatalities in traffic crashes involved at least one driver who was speeding
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!