During the Enlightenment, serious thinkers began to embrace the idea of suppressing oppressive governments through Popular consent.
<h3>What was
Enlightenment period?</h3>
Enlightenment, can be described as the period in Europe around 17th century that brought about intellectual and philosophical movement .
In this case, serious thinkers began to embrace the idea of suppressing oppressive governments through Popular consent.
Learn more on Enlightenment at: brainly.com/question/1688832
#SPJ1
Before the Supreme Court of the United States decisions of Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decriminalized abortion nationwide in 1973, abortion was already legal in several states, but the decision in the former case imposed a uniform framework for state legislation on the subject.
Answer:
The act of inflciting bodily harm to the woman is a crime under "actus reus".
But there is no intentional crime committed under "mens rea".
So, the act doesn't qualify as a crime.
Explanation:
In criminal law,<u> "actus reus" is when a person physically harms another person</u> along with <u>"mens rea" which is the mental intention of doing the crime and planning it</u>. That means that an act can be considered a crime only when the actus reus and mens rea are hand-in-hand.
In the given scenario, Joseph's act of slamming his hand on the table is the result of his anger on being served a non-vegetarian dish even though he is a vegan. And this resulted in the bodily harm of the woman nearby. And this act of inflicting bodily harm to another person is not an intentional act, for Joseph did not pre-plan it. So, we can safely say that <u>the action does not constitute a criminal act.
</u>