I believe the answer is tense
In both cases, it is considered plagiarism.
- when the post written for the client on the platform will be published on its own blog.
- when a post written for a client resell to another client.
<h3>What is Plagiarism?</h3>
Plagiarism refers to the act when any individual copied the content of another author or writer as presented as their own work without taking permission from them.
In both, the cases consent from the client has not been taken which shows the case of theft, as after giving content to the client it belongs to them only. So both the cases are considered plagiarism.
Learn more about Plagiarism, here:
brainly.com/question/27960172
#SPJ1
Although Mccandless rejected the authority imposed on him by others, he takes an authoritarian stand on his own choices.
Explanation:
Chris Mcandless was a young man who abandoned social life to spend two years living in the jungle, with few resources, food and water. He took this action because he wanted to achieve definitive freedom, far from social rules and standards and economic and capitalist demands.
McCandless rejected the idea of authority, but he did not accept any advice and attempt to prevent that decision, behaving in an authoritarian manner and assuming the behavior that he rejected.
