Answer:
The correct answer is A) they both describe the relationship of those in power over those not in power
Explanation:
A is correct answer because in both systems there are clear differences between those who are owing land and those who are working on it. In the feudal system, owner of the land (senior) is giving land for usage to his vassals, while peasants are doing all the hard work. It is the same in manorial system, peasants are practically dependent on the land they are working on, and sometimes are not even allowed to leave it.
B is not correct because these systems have nothing to do with education.
C is not correct, because there was practically no middle class in that period, especially in the feudal system.
Answer:
The Scorpion Kings of the Predynastic Period in Egypt (c. 6000-3150 BCE) obviously had a form of monarchial government, but exactly how it operated is not known.
Explanation:
The government of ancient Egypt was a theocratic monarchy as the king ruled by a mandate from the gods, initially was seen as an intermediary between human beings and the divine, and was supposed to represent the gods' will through the laws passed and policies approved. A central government in Egypt is evident by c. 3150 BCE when King Narmer unified the country, but some form of government existed prior to this date.
Answer:1)the United Nations 2)Yalta Conference 3)Roosevelt,Churchill,and Stalin
Answer:
Supporters of Laissez faire believe that this type of system promotes more incentives to trade and economic growth, in addition to encouraging freedom among companies.
Supporters of economic intervention, on the other hand, believe that the intervention promotes fairer and more equitable trade and allows new companies to become as influential as old companies, which will promote economic growth.
Explanation:
Economic intervention allows the government of a country to impose limits and interference in trade and the productive sector. These limitations prevent economically strong companies from dominating an entire productive sector, promoting more commercial fairness and allowing new companies to emerge in addition to allowing small companies to grow in the same sector as large companies.
Laissez Faire, on the other hand, discredits any government intervention in trade and this imposes freedom on companies and industries, which will allow full production and vast economic growth.
