A cultural historian would get, by interviewing unemployed people during the Great Depression, B. The names of specific people who were unemployed and D. Stories about the experience of being unemployed.
This is because such historian would be doing microhistory, gathering information and stories about people directly from the source, while the economic historian would be doing macro-history, not paying attention to individuals.
They helped with social reforms such as race, sex, etc
<span>Feudalism protected peasants because feudal lords gave them protection in return for fiefs </span>
I think its the executive. But it may be all of them because they balance each other out, no one is higher or lower
