Answer:
Explanation:
Great question, intermediaries are sometimes necessary since they provide a service in which you might not be able to get the product if their service wasn't provided. That being said we can say that Caesar's claim is not valid in many cases. Intermediaries tend to add an additional cost to a certain product, but like mentioned above they are providing an essential value. In many cases the value they create more than offsets the costs they add. Therefore the validity of Caesar's claim is dependent on the intermediaries provided value.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
$4 advantage
Explanation:
In this question we need to compare the cost between the relevant cost and the outside supplier cost
The relevant cost is
= Direct material per unit + direct labor per unit + variable manufacturing overhead per unit + fixed manufacturing overhead per unit
= $8 + $5 + $3 + $5 × 80%
= $8 + $5 + $3 + $4
= $20
Since 80% of the fixed manufacturing cost above is eliminated so we considered the same
And, the outside supplier cost is $16
So based on the above calculation, the financial advantage is
= $20 - $16
= $4 advantage
This shows the company should purchased from outside supplier as it saves $4
The elements that would have to be in place for a contract to be unconscionable would be that
- They were under pressure
- They were misled
- They did not have the right information
<h3>What is meant by a contract?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that two people or more have agreed to do business with themselves.
In order to be a contract, one person would have to create a bargain and the other would be the one that would agree to the terms.
It is unconscionable at the time when the contract is done and the person or one of the parties is found not to have been able to make the contract agreement at their right frame of mind. In this case, the law has the power to protect this party.
Hence they would have to rule in his favor. Therefore to be unconscionable, a contract would have to have been misled, have been made under duress and without the adequate information.
Read more on contracts here:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
Answer:
It would appear that she develops a participatory leadership or management.
Explanation:
"Theory Y managers have an optimistic, positive opinion of their people, and they use a decentralized, participative management style. This encourages a more collaborative, trust-based relationship between managers and their team members.
People have greater responsibility, and managers encourage them to develop their skills and suggest improvements. Appraisals are regular but, unlike in Theory X [authoritative] organizations, they are used to encourage open communication rather than control staff."
Reference: Mind Tools Content Team. “Theory X and Theory Y: Understanding People's Motivations.” Team Management Training from MindTools.com, 2019.
Answer:
b. set in when the fifth worker is hired
After this point additional worker return will be lower.
Explanation:
Trhe diminishing return are the moment at which the marginal increase in production decrease.
In other words, adding a new resource provide less return than his predecessor.
Marginal
2 do 4 hours
3 do 6 houses (marginal 6 - 4 = 2)
4 do 9 houses (marginal 9 - 6 = 3)
5 do 13 houses (marginal 13 - 9 = 4)
6 do 15 houses (marginal 15 - 13 = 2)
the marginal output decrease from 4 to 2 the returns decreased.
