Answer:
1.B
2.D
3.C
Explanation:
those just make the most sense
The oil is denser
the water and vinegar are not as dense
Answer:
Option (B) $5,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Repayment of Loan = $50,000
Interest = 8%
Cash flow Probability
$65,000 70%
$45,000 30%
Tax rate = 0%
Now,
Interest on loan = 8% of $50,000
= $4,000
Expected value of cash flow = ∑[cash flow × Probability ]
= ( 0.7 × $65,000 ) + ( 0.3 × $45,000 )
= $45,500 + $13,500
= $59,000
The owner's expected cash flow after debt service
= Expected value of cash flow - Interest on loan - Repayment of Loan
= $59,000 - $4,000 - $50,000
= $5,000
Hence,
Option (B) $5,000
Answer:
Implicit costs do not require a direct monetary outlay by the firm, whereas explicit costs do.
Explanation:
Rent, salary, and other operating expenses are considered explicit costs. They are all recorded within a firm's financial statements, meaning they are present and clearly shown or reported as a separate cost. The main difference between the two types of costs is that implicit costs are opportunity costs, meaning that it is present but it is not initially shown or reported as a separate cost, while explicit costs are expenses paid with a company's own tangible assets. In other words, explicit costs are always shown, implicit costs are not, at least initially, exactly like the meaning words suggest.
Assuming that you have the values for the year 2017, the break-even point would be 1500 units for the year 2017. To calculate this, we use the idea that at the breaking point, total sales is equal to the total cost or expenses made. Which would be:
selling (x) = fixed + variable (x)
x = fixed / (selling - variable)
x = 270000 / (600-420)
x = 1500 units
