1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_tiger [21]
3 years ago
6

An officer arrests a known criminal on charges of trespassing and illegal possession of police-grade equipment when the case goe

s to court: the defense argues that the arrest was unlawful under 5 R. Stat. § 312 (If the District Attorney refuses to defend an agent of the government, then that agent shall be liable for the equitable offenses in his individual capacity, and the government shall cease to be a party and have interest in the case.), due to the weapons having been stashed in a friend's vehicle previously. However, the Deputy did witness the act of the weapons being stashed away. Is the arrest false? Why or why not? *
Law
1 answer:
Yuri [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The First Amendment Handbook provides a basic primer on the laws affecting reporters’ rights to gather and disseminate news.

Seventh Edition

Lucy A. Dalglish, Executive Director

Gregg P. Leslie, Editor

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Funding for this publication provided by: Gannett Foundation and The Scheide Fund.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. — The First Amendment

Introduction

On a Sunday afternoon in March 1970, a group of journalists and media lawyers, concerned over FBI attempts to find the sources for journalists’ reports on radical groups, gathered at Georgetown University to create an organization that would be available around the clock to provide legal assistance to any working reporter, anywhere in the United States, without charge.

Since that founding meeting, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has been just what its name implies — an organization dedicated first to the interests of the reporter. From the start, the medium of communication and the means of employment have not mattered. The committee has helped all those who take it as their mission to inform the public about current events.

For more than 50 years, the Reporters Committee has carried out that vision, giving legal advice to thousands of journalists and producing publications to help them do their jobs.

The First Amendment Handbook is one of those publications. First produced in 1986, and updated regularly since then, this booklet is designed to provide a basic primer on the laws affecting reporters’ rights to gather and disseminate news.

At a time when newsgathering techniques are under increasing scrutiny, courts order journalists to jail for refusing to disclose confidential sources, government officials are finding new ways to close down access to public information in the name of national security, and big business tries to intimidate news organizations by filing lawsuits based on novel tort theories ranging from fraud to breach of duty of loyalty, American journalists need to be aware of the many potential pitfalls that await them, and of how they might avoid them. They need to know their rights, and how to fight back when they are threatened. The First Amendment Handbook is an important weapon in that fight.

You might be interested in
QUESTION 7
Zigmanuir [339]

If the president opposes the bill, he can veto it and return the bill to Congress with a veto message suggesting changes unless the Congress is out of session then the president may rely on a pocket veto. ... Congress may override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate.

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
1. Is Defensible Space Theory a logical explanation for controlling crime? Why or why not?
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.

2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing

8 0
3 years ago
Why is the united states court system considered hierarchical?
MAXImum [283]

your answer would be B

B is the correct answer

7 0
3 years ago
The power that allows congress to take private property for such uses as an interstate highway or a national park is
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

B the power of eminent domain

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
before you change lanes what coming up in your lane and in your traget lane as well as what directly behind you answer option, t
anygoal [31]
So say you are changing into your left lane. You NEED TO THINK ABOUT who’s behind you. Who’s next to you. who’s in your blind spot. And who’s in front of you. Because. You could hit someone in all these spots
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to the International Association of Chiefs of Police, GPS monitors can assist in court proceedings, case management pl
    12·1 answer
  • In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Supreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had denied Furman the right
    8·2 answers
  • Alcohol has many sensations and effects like:______
    15·2 answers
  • How does the chain of command facilitate the operations of a large structured organization?
    14·1 answer
  • Raleigh, a 55-year-old experienced sales representative at BigCo, is terminated and replaced with Connelly at a lower pay rate.
    5·1 answer
  • Looking at the misty rain and fog explain at least two defensive driving techniques you would utilize to
    15·1 answer
  • What is a linear?<br> in mathmatics
    9·2 answers
  • Need help please its for forensic science
    13·1 answer
  • The President of Mexico is elected by popular vote for a term of this number of years.
    6·1 answer
  • Do u like jazz i do what abt u
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!