The Framers had good reason to seek to “insure” domestic tranquility. Literally “domestic Tranquility” means peace and quiet at home—at home in America, as opposed to in other nations. Tranquility for the Framers meant the absence of riots, rebellions, and similar symptoms of social disorder.
The fallacy used by the teacher is called the fallacy of false causality.
<h3>How is this fallacy established?</h3>
- The fallacy of false chance establishes a relation between two elements.
- This relationship is false and does not present any type of interaction.
The fallacy of false causality establishes two elements in a cause-and-effect relationship, however, this relationship is false.
This can be seen in the statement made by the professor, where he shows that the passage of planes is responsible for the hot weather. However, the increase in temperature is caused by weather factors that are not influenced by airplanes.
Therefore, there is no cause-and-effect relationship between the planes and the climate of the region, which shows that this statement is incorrect.
Learn more about fallacies:
brainly.com/question/1178948
#SPJ1
Answer:
See explaination
Explanation:
1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.
2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing
Answer:
hold power with the upper house legislative
Explanation:
