Answer: Data mining
Explanation: Patterns and relationships as indicated are discovered through a technique known as data mining, which is defined as the use of a variety of statistical analysis tools in marketing research to uncover previously unknown patterns in data or relationships among variables. It is also given as a technique for searching large scale databases for patterns; used mainly to find previously unknown correlations between variables that may be commercially useful.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the percentage of change is as follows;
a. For 2020 to 2021
= (Net income in 2021 - net income is 2020) ÷ (net income in 2020)
= ($473,000 - $503,000) ÷ ($503,000)
= -5.96% decrease
b .For 2021 to 2022
= (Net income in 2022 - net income is 2021) ÷ (net income in 2021)
= ($521,000 - $473,000) ÷ ($473,000)
= 10.15% increase
In this way it is calculated
In a market economy, like the one described in the question, there is the potential to achieve efficiency in production. This is because producers can choose what they produce and can focus on the products they are good at. This can help with economies of scale and efficiency.
Trade will benefit countries when it generates gold and silver for the national treasury.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
