There should be no justification of going to war unless the opposing side is harming your country and countrymen, economically, physically, or by isolating you. But as a politician anything that economically benefits my country would be justified if me going to a war. Taylor, had done the same during the Spanish American war by blaming Mexico of stealing Texas back, even though the land was Mexico's back then. He'd done it to enlarge America's land, Manifest Destiny. He spread the propaganda that Mexican troops attacked American, which emotionalism do Americans and they ended up backing up Taylor's decision of going on a war.
Answer:
IT WAS REPRESENTATIONS OF JEWS AND JUDAISM IN TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY BRITISH HISTORICAL FICTION FOR CHILDREN
Answer:
Deganawida acted as the visionary and, because Deganawida had a speech impediment, Hiawatha served as his spokesman. Deganawida's message to the Iroquois was that all men are brothers, they should cease their practices of killing each other.
Explanation:
Answer:
Americans surprised London merchants by boycotting English goods while the Stamp Act was in effect. ... In October 1765, the colonies became more unified when the Colonial Congress met to discuss the Stamp Act in New York. Colonial leaders convened and formally advocated the boycott of British goods.
Explanation:
The correct answer is C) A slave was not a citizen but rather the property of an owner.
The Dred Scott vs. Sandford case revolved around the claims of Dred Scott, a black man who was a slave. This man argued that he should be free, as his owner brought him into the Illnois territory were slavery was prohibited. Essentially, Scott argued that his living in this territory should make him free.
However, the Supreme Court ruled against Scott. The majority opinion discussed how slaves are property and that they have no rights in which white men need to respect. This controversial case caused a huge division in American society.