third person limited happens when the story is told from a character's perspective, while a story in third person omniscient is told by a narrator that is external to the story not a character.
Answer:
Ok here are my answers...
Explanation:
I would say whatever challenge they have physically or mentally, or what they have to overcome during the story.
It can be internal mostly, because it is something mentally to overcome. External would be Man vs. Man, Man vs. Nature, or maybe Man vs. Society.
The conflict would be when things start to go awry or be more interesting. The sensory details could commit some more drama to the conflict depending on what the conflict is.
I hope this helps. I did not see the narratives that you were talking about, but I did my best. :)
If you watch a video on it, They are amazed.
If a writer is structuring an argument towards an audience that has an interest in a specific cause, the writer will use specific vocabulary, details, stories, and facts that appeal to that cause. Pathos (the use of emotional appeal in an argument) is a strong benefit to add to an argument, and the writer might take a specific story of someone who has been affected by the cause in order to make the audience emotional. If they become emotionally invested in the argument it is more likely to be effective. Additionally, specific vocabulary (including abbreviations) and relevant facts (logos) will help the audience understand and appreciate the argument. Finally, the author should establish their credibility (ethos) as an expert on the subject so that the audience trusts what they are saying.
Read about the topic of the discussion
