Explain how secondary sources should be used in analytical research report, compared to primary sources.

English

1 answer:

Levart [38]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Primary sources provide raw information and first-hand evidence. ... A primary source gives you direct access to the subject of your research. Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers. Examples include journal articles, reviews, and academic books

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which of the three spirits is the most influential in Ebenezer Scrooge's<br> transformation?

ololo11 [35]

Answer:

The ghost of Christmas

The ghost of Christmas yet to come has the most impact on Scrooge because it makes him fear what has yet to come and makes him want to change in any way possible.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Why is Calixta happy at the end of the story? How can everyone be happy at the end of the story? What does the author's attitude

babymother [125]

This question is about "the storm" by Kate Chopin

Answer Explanation:

1. Calixta is happy at the end of the story because her son and her husband arrive home safely, even in the face of the storm, besides, she does not feel any remorse for the adultery she committed.

2. Everyone is happy because she has a family that was not destroyed by her actions, and they know that adultery is impossible to be discovered, so their lives, as they are used to, will be maintained.

3. Reading the short story, we have the impression that the author does not encourage adultery, but does not see it as something capable of destroying a family and ruining the marriage, but rather as something that can be kept secret, without hurting anyone.

4. The only moral tone that can be considered in this story is that people should do what they want and make them happy regardless of the rules established by society.

5 0

2 years ago

What is your opinion of cancel culture as a whole? In a 2019 interview, Barack Obama challenged youth activists on their “purity

SOVA2 [1]

My idea on cancel culture is that it can get extreme and unproductive when it gets toxic.

<h3>Cancel culture</h3>

Cancel culture is a way that people use to express their displeasure and anger over issues that they find dissatisfying.

It leads to ostracizing people or organizations due to their acts, behaviors or opinions.

Even though it can deter people and even organizations from posting offensive views, it could be negative most times.

Cancel culture can get too far when the people are against anyone who has a different opinion from them.
It could be regarded as toxic if it drives the other party to want to harm themselves
If it involves invasion of privacy and threat.

It is not the best response for wrongdoing because there are other ways of tackling issues and disagreements without ostracizing the other person.