Answer:
A 6 lb bag of another brand
Step-by-step explanation:
N+2 would be the correct answer... i think!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hope i helped!!!!!!!!
Alright, so 3f-g=4 and f+2g=5.
3f-g=4
f+2g=5
Multiplying the first equation by 2 and adding it to the second, we get 7f=13 and by dividing both sides by 7 we get f=13/7. Since f+2g=5, then we can plug 13/7 in for f to get 13/7+2g=5. Next, we subtract 13/7 from both sides to get 2g=3+1/7=22/7 (since 3*7=21 and 21+1=22). DIviding both sides by 2, we get 22/14=g. Plugging that into f/39g, we get (13/7)/(22*39/14)
= (13/7)/(858/14)
= (13/7)*(14/858)
=182/6006
= 91/3003 (by dividing both numbers by 2)
= 13/429 (by dividing both numbers by 7)
= 1/33 (by dividing both numbers by 13)
Answer:
The Latin phrase is "reduction ad absurd um", meaning reduction to absurdity. You assume the opposite and show that logically it leads to a contradiction and therefore cannot be true.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
0.0062
Step-by-step explanation:
Let X be the diagnosed blood sugar level.
Probability of committing a Type II error = Probability of failing to detect the disease when the person has the disease = Probability that the diagnosed blood sugar level is less than or equal to 125 =
![= P[Z\le (125 - 150)/10]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%20P%5BZ%5Cle%20%28125%20-%20150%29%2F10%5D)
![=P[Z \le -2.5]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3DP%5BZ%20%5Cle%20-2.5%5D)
= 0.0062
