Answer:
12 x ≤ 48
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality must have two sides, one that shows the expenditure Mary will do in function on the number of shirts (x) and other that shows the maximum money she can spend (48).
Her expenditure will depend on the shirts purchased (x) and as each shirt costs $12 the expenditure will be 12x. So, this expenditure MUST be equal or less to the maximum she can pay: $48.
The inequality will be:
12 x ≤ 48
This is the first of the options posted. From the others, none of them work.
Answer:
0.45
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:

Step 2:
8 · x = 0.3 · 12
8x = 3.6
Last Step: Divide both sides by 8 to isolate the value x
Answer:
Option C.
Step-by-step explanation:
We start with the expression:

where y > 0. (this allow us to have y inside a square root, so we don't mess with complex numbers)
We want to find the equivalent expression to this one.
Here, we can do the next two simplifications:

And:

If we apply these two to our initial expression, we can rewrite it as:


Here we can use the second simplification again, to rewrite:

So, concluding, we have:

Then the correct option is C.
Answer:
positive
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation of a line modeling the price of a car over the years from its initial purchase is to be a line with negative slope "m" due to the fact that the price of the car drops with the years, but for sure the price at the time of purchase (which is the zero in the horizontal x-axis) should be the largest value the car would have (the purchase price) This is actually the y-intercept "b", clearly a positive number.
Answer:


Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Composite Function</u>
Suppose f(x) and g(x) are real functions, the composite function named
is defined as:

The composite function can be found by substituting g into f.
We are given these functions:



Find:
a) h(g(x))
Substituting g into h:

b) h(g(f(x))
First we find g(f(x)):

Operating:

Simplifying:

Now find h(g(f(x)) replacing the above equation into h:

Simplifying and rearranging:

