9514 1404 393
Answer:
39.375 : 65.625
Step-by-step explanation:
The meaning of "reduce" in this context is unclear. We assume you want to divide the quantity 105 into parts that have a ratio of 3 : 5. Then the smaller part will be 3/(3+5) = 3/8 of the total; the larger part will be 5/8 of the total.
3/8 × 105 = 39 3/8
5/8 × 105 = 65 5/8
The divided quantities are ...
39.375 : 65.625
Step-by-step explanation:
S = 93 log (d) + 65; S = wind speed; d = distance traveled by tornado
A) tornado travels 130 miles = d; find S
S = 93 log10(130) + 65
S = 261.6 mph rounds up to 262 mph
<h2><u><em>
$6.25</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>
</em></u></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
because 1 kg is worth 2 is 1/4 is worth .25
so multiply 2 by 3 and add 1/4
good luck hope this helps.
Answer:
Since the calculated value of z= 1.6279 does not fall in the critical region Z ≥ ±1.96 we conclude that there is no difference between the population variance and the sample variance.
Step-by-step explanation:
The data given is
Population mean μ= $ 7.18
Population variance= σ²= 3.81
Population Standard Deviation = √σ²= √3.81= 1.952
Sample Mean= x`= $ 8.02
Sample Standard Deviation =s = $ 2.08
Sample Size = 15
Significance Level = ∝= 0.05
The null and alternate hypotheses are
H0: σ1=σ2 against the claim that Ha: σ1≠ σ2
where σ1 is the population variance and
σ2 is the sample variance
The rejection region is Z ≥ ±1.96 for two tailed test at ∝= 0.05
The test statistic z is used
z= x`- μ/ σ/√n
Putting the values
Z= 8.02-7.18/1.952/√15
z= 0.84/0.51599
z= 1.6279
Since the calculated value of z= 1.6279 does not fall in the critical region Z ≥ ±1.96 we conclude that there is no difference between the population variance and the sample variance.
