Answer: Valuing diversity could be manged easier than managing diversity
Explanation:
Valuing diversity could be described as recognizing or observing the difference between people and acknowledge the fact that the differences are a valued asset. It is creating a work place that respects the differences about people but looks out more for what each individual is bringing to the team amidst all these, looking out for their potentials and how they can deliver, even in their differences.
An example of valuing diversity is having a group of different tribe of people or different religious people working in an environment. Communication does not really affect these process so long they are all focused on the task.
Managing diverities is defined as setting up a system or structure that tends to manage a group of people so that their potential advantage of diversity is maximized more than the disadvantages their diversity would bring.
An example of these is having the same temperamental kind of persons on the same team, assuming they all get angry easily, and working out a system that maximizes their effectiveness.
There could be a bridge in communication sometimes here than the valuing diversity.
It effects the animals who have home there or have food there and they will have to evacuate the area.
The correct answer is D., because if its little its easily repayed but if its to large it becomes harder to repay, I hope this helps you have an amazing day!!
~<span>razerthebrainieace</span>
It is a governmental structure which reduces personal freedoms. It limits innovation. It encourages illegal activities. It eliminates the competition. It reduces communication. It reduces exports. It creates incentives that people don’t see as an incentive. Sorry I dont know how to do the drawing
