The Liberals were defeated is the answer to this.
Anti- Federalists opposed the new constitution. Before we were under the articles of confederation which was a weak government. The new constitution was a good idea but some opposed and made the Anti-Federalists papers firing back on Alexander Hamiltons Federalist papers which promoted the idea of the new constitution.
Liberalism can be summed up as the postulate of the free use by each individual or member of a society of his property (the fact that some have only one property: their workforce while others own the means of production is not denied, only omitted). In this sense, all men are equal, a fact enshrined in the fundamental principle of the bourgeois constitution: all are equal before the law, the concrete basis of formal equality between the members of a society. In an extension of this, a second idea proposes the commonwealth, according to which property and freedom-based social organization serves the good of all. (Incidentally, if there is no antagonism between social classes, action can be driven by reason, hence rationalism.) This is the crux of the ideological proposition, which seeks the consented domination of workers through the operation of identifying the interest of the ruling class (maintaining the prevailing social order) with the interest of society as a whole - the nation.
Slaveholders wanted to expand slavery west, and conflict broke out between anti-slavery and pro-slavery Americans in Kansas I.E Bloody Kansas.
2. Because it set the precedent through the Supreme Court that blacks whether free or still in slavery were not citizens and were considered property (if slaves), therefore could not sue in court. The north was primarily against slavery whereas the South was pro-slavery.
I think that this is a multiple choice question, and that the correct asnwer is :Toussaint L'ouverture (we was a freedom fighter in Haiti) , Father Hidalgo (Mexican priest and fighter in the independence war) , Jose de San Martin (in Argentina).
