1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Studentka2010 [4]
3 years ago
7

Charles Berkle is the manager of Nogain Manufacturing and is interested in doing a cost of quality analysis. The following cost

and revenue data are available for the most recent year ended December 31: Sales revenue$250,000 Cost of goods sold 140,000 Warranty expense 21,000 Inspection costs 15,000 Scrap and rework 8,600 Product returns due to defects 6,000 Depreciation expense 10,000 Machine maintenance expense 3,000 Wage expense 35,000 Machine breakdown costs 4,000 Estimated lost sales due to poor quality 5,000

Business
1 answer:
Georgia [21]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

a. The classification is shown below:

Prevention cost: This cost incurred so that the faults, or defects could be minimized as compare to before. It includes the machine maintenance expense i.e $3,000

Appraisal cost: This cost incurred specially to meet the quality of the customer expectations. It is a quality control cost. It includes the inspection cost of $15,000

Internal failure: This cost is occurred before delivery the product from the factory. It includes  Scrap and rework of $8,600 and Machine breakdown cost of $4,000  

External failure: This cost is occurred after delivery the product. It includes the warranty expense of $21,000, product return due to defects of $6,000 and Estimated lost sales due to poor quality of $5,000

b. Now the percentage is

= (Prevention and appraisal cost) ÷ (Sales revenue) × 100

= ($3,000 + $15,000) ÷ ($250,000) × 100

= 7.2%

c. The percentage is

= (Internal and external failures) ÷ (Sales revenue) × 100

= ($8,600 + $4,000 + $21,000 + $6,000 + $5,000) ÷ ($250,000) × 100

= 17.84%

Below is the attachment for cost of quality report

You might be interested in
On the food label for a package of crackers, what does a 15 percent daily value for iron mean?
Tanya [424]
A 15% percent daily value for iron means that one serving of the cracker provides 15 percent of the iron that the average person needs each day.
The Daily Value or the DVs for short is an indicator that shows information about the nutrient that can be provided in one serving of the food for an average person. The average person is a healthy adult who consumes exactly 2000 calories a day which became an indicator basis for The Daily Value<span>.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss the pros and cons of four performance appraisal tools​
Tresset [83]

Answer:

Pros and cons are for every method listed below. A person can only see his strength and power during self assessment and he may ignore all his mistakes as it can be his over confidence in himself. Graphic rating may be disappointing as many employees can get same rating and there will not be any difference among them in the pay rise.

Explanation:

There are four major performance appraisal tools

1. Self assessment

2. Graphic Rating

3. Behavioral Checklist

4. 360 degree feedback

5 0
2 years ago
You are considering two investment alternatives. The first is a stock that pays quarterly dividends of $0.32 per share and is tr
MrMuchimi

Answer:

The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.

Explanation:

<u>For First stock </u>

Total dividend from first stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.32 * 2 = $0.64

HPR of first stock = (Total dividend from first stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($0.64 + ($31.72 - $27.85)) / $27.85 = 0.1619, or 16.19%

Annualized holding period return of first stock = HPR of first stock * Number 6 months in a year = 16.19% * 2 = 32.38%

<u>For Second stock </u>

Total dividend from second stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.67 * 4 = $2.68

Since you expect to sell the stock in one year, we have:

Annualized holding period return of second stock = The 1-year HPR for the second stock = (Total dividend from second stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($2.68+ ($36.79 - $34.98)) / $34.98 = 0.1284, or 12.84%

Since the Annualized holding period return of first stock of 32.38% is higher than the Annualized holding period return of second stock of 12.84%. the first stock will provide the better annualized holding period return.

The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.

6 0
3 years ago
Selected current year company information follows: Net income $ 17,753 Net sales 730,855 Total liabilities, beginning-year 101,9
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

6.03%

Explanation:

Calculation for the return on total assets

First step will be to find the assets at the beginning using this formula

Beginning year Assets =Beginning Total liabilities + Beginning Stockholders' equity

Let plug in the formula

Beginning year Assets=$101,932 + $216,935

Beginning year Assets=$318,867

Second step is to find the end of the year asset using this formula

End of the year assets = Ending Total liabilities + Ending Stockholders' equity

Let plug in the formula

End of the year assets=$121,201 + $148,851

End of the year assets = $270,052

Last step is to calculate for the return on total assets using this formula

Return on total assets = Net income/Average of total assets,

Let find the Total asset averages

Using this formula

Total asset averages=(Beginning year Assets+End of the year assets)/2

Let plug in the formula

Total asset averages($318,867 + $270,052)/2 Total asset averages=$588,919/2

Total asset averages= $294,459.50

Hence,

Return on total assets = Net income/Average of total assets

Return on total assets=$ 17,753/294,459.50

Return on total assets=0.0603

Return on total assets=6.03%

Therefore the return on total assets will be 6.03%

8 0
3 years ago
How might the inability to provide fringe benefits affect a sole proprietors ability to run a business
Reika [66]
The inability of sole proprietors to provide fringe benefits to their employees can affect the service rendered to customers. Without fringe benefits, the employer will not be able to attract quality applicants for his business. He may have to settle for less qualified staff who may not be able to provide clients with excellent service.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A small electronics company has begun production of a small line of high-quality, professional studio-model components targeted
    12·1 answer
  • What is meant by “moe”? for the effectiveness analysis of a sport utility vehicle (suv), list what you think would be the 10 mos
    15·1 answer
  • Newspaper 14 think and review
    11·1 answer
  • Of the world's population of 7.5 billion people, _________ are scraping by on incomes that average less than $2 per day.
    14·1 answer
  • Which characteristics of capitalism provide an opportunity for entrepreneurship and allow both buyers and sellers to feel they m
    9·2 answers
  • otal asset turnover 2.6 Profit margin 6.6 % Equity multiplier 1.5 Payout ratio 25 % What is the sustainable growth rate?
    11·1 answer
  • How long do you have to file a complaint with osha ?
    6·1 answer
  • The cost slope of an activity $ 250/day. The normal duration of this activity is 15 days, the crash cost is $1,500 and the maxim
    6·1 answer
  • Freè 30 Points just answer this simple question!!! Im Moving Next Week on the 1st, what is the most efficient way to unpack and
    6·2 answers
  • a type of group that has a constitution and bylaws and has been organized for purposes other than obtaining insurance is called
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!