I don't know if the sentences below the questions are multiple choice answers but they had to because a market failure has occurred and the market has not provided them
People in the South welcomed the decision, while people in the North feared it.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "C. Washington served only 2 terms as president, though the Constitution did not impose this limit." Washington's actions set a precedent that a president could take decisive action in foreign policy without consulting Congress is that he<span> served only 2 terms as president, though the Constitution did not impose this limit</span>
Answer:
now tell me if you like
Explanation:
Salva did encounter many difficult things while being just a littel boy and many difficult challenges during his journy i may have done some things different. For example, while salva was with his group starving i may have acted greedy sometimes and try to eat more. Also since he had no family i would have also made a friend like him (Maria) but i would have done more so we can protect each other. Like he did i would have also tried to find shelter and help since chances of survival are low. Salva for me was a very insipirning person since he never gave up and faced such hard challenges at such a young age
Answer: The answer is:
Case name: <u><em> Schenck v. United
</em></u>
<u><em>States</em></u>
Summary of the case and ruling: <em>During World War I, socialists Charles Schenck general secretary of the U.S. Socialist Party, and Elizabeth Baer distributed some 15,000 leaflets declaring that the draft violated the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude.The leaflets called for men who were drafted to resist military service. Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of 1917 by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment. Schenck and Baer were convicted of violating this law and appealed on the grounds that the statute violated the First Amendment. .</em>
Effects on the interpretation of the First Amendment:
Oliver Wendell Holmes concluded that the First Amendment does not protect speech that approaches creating a clear and present danger of a significant evil that Congress has power to prevent. Holmes reasoned that the widespread dissemination of the leaflets was sufficiently likely to disrupt the conscription process. Famously, he compared the leaflets to falsely shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theatre, which is not permitted under the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote:
<u><em>"words which, ordinarily and in many places, would be within the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment may become subject to prohibition when of such a nature and used in such circumstances as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils which Congress has a right to prevent".</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
