<span>The Korean War had its immediate origins in the collapse of the Japanese empire at the end of World War II in September 1945
</span>
Consequently the allies decided to divide the territory, into two halves along the 38th parallel, with an ultimate aim of reunification, which was not forthcoming. The northern unpopular regime decided to initiate the agreement and the war broke.
<span />
"<span>because the trend of Chinese immigrants to large urban cities harmed the industrialization of the US economy" is the best option but there were wavering levels of truth to this. </span>
Answer:
The repeal of the commitment to Missouri affected Kansas because it allowed for an open conflict between abolitionists and slaveholders.
Explanation:
The Missouri Compromise, also called the 1820 Commitments, was an agreement passed in 1820 between pro-slavery and pro-abolitionist groups in the United States of America, primarily involving the regulation of slave labor in the western territories.
In 1850, the Missouri Compromise goes into crisis. California wanted to enter the Union as a free state, but it was located south of the parallel of 36 ° 30 '- that is, between the slave states. The war seemed close, but then a new agreement emerged: California was admitted with a free state, the other free states were forced to repatriate fugitive slaves, and New Mexico and Utah gained bylaws of territories and not states, that is, without own laws against or in favor of slavery.
The definitive crisis of the Missouri Compromise occurred in 1854 with the Kansas-Nebraska bill, authored by Douglas Douglas of Ilhinóis. Douglas proposed the Organization of Kansas and Nebraska as territories with freedom of choice, by popular decision, between being or not slave state. And as I encouraged the occupation, Douglas suggested that the railroad, still under construction, cut off the two territories. Congress passed the propositions, nullifying the Missouri Compromise. The confrontation between free states and slave states became then open and declared.
Answer
is they made them is they said no
Explanation:
Answer: (A)
Explanation: Production were much more organized during the late 19th century and on a larger scale because of factories. (B) doesn't make sense because wage level were not going up, (C) is wrong because it said "only" to foreign markets, and lastly (D) is wrong because government had less involvement in business (laissez-faire).