Answer:
Option (C)
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
Price of salt increases by = 25%
Quantity of pepper demanded increases by = 4%
Cross price elasticity = Quantity of demand increases ÷ Price of salt increases
= 4% ÷ 25%
=0.16
Hence Cross-price elasticity of demand between salt and pepper would be positive.
So option (C) is answer
Answer:
a. $12.08 per share
Explanation:
For computing the next year stock we have to do the following calculations
Current Earning per share = Net Income ÷ Number of Common Shares Outstanding
= $9,750,000 ÷ 5,500,000 shares
= $1.77
Current Price Earning ratio = Current stock price ÷ Current EPS
= $14.74 ÷ $1.77
= 8.33
Now Next year earning per share = $9,750,000 × 1.25 ÷ 8,400,000 shares = $1.45
So, the next year stock price = $1.45 x 8.33
= $12.08 per share
Answer:
Lynn will receive $63,754 at the end of 8 years.
Explanation:
Future value is the sum of value of principal invested and compounded return received over the investment period.
Using following formula of future value to calculate the required interest rate.
FV = PV x ( 1 + r )^n
PV = Present value = $40,000
n = number of years = 8 years
r = Interest rate = 6%
FV = Future value = ?
FV = $40,000 x ( 1 + 6% )^8 = $63,754
Answer: reduce output.
Explanation:
In a competitive market, firms do not have control over the price that they sell their goods in the market but they do have control over their costs. It is recommended to produce/ sell goods at a quantity where Marginal Revenue will equal Marginal cost (MR = MC).
In a Competitive Market, Price is the same as Marginal revenue which means that Marginal revenue here is $25 and the Marginal Cost is $26. At this quantity of output, the Marginal Cost is larger than the Marginal revenue.
Company should therefore reduce output to a quantity where Marginal Cost will equal Marginal revenue.
Answer:
The value of the intangible will remain at $350,000
Explanation:
The reason is that the International Accounting Standard IAS-36 says that once the impairment is recognized for the intangible assets it can not be reversed which means that the amount reported would be $350,000. The reason is that it is very rare that the asset gain its value and specially those which are intangible assets. Most of the management in the 1990s-2000 tried to recognize a gain on impairment which was unjustifiable to increase their profits for the period so the standard specifically didn't permitted gain on a previously impaired asset.
