1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ella [17]
3 years ago
9

Who could be criticized under the Sedition Act?

History
1 answer:
Colt1911 [192]3 years ago
8 0
The answer to this question is D
You might be interested in
How did the 13th,14th,15th,19th,and 26 amendment impact minority participation in the political process?
lozanna [386]
They helped with social reforms such as race, sex, etc
4 0
3 years ago
True/False<br> The Townshend Acts were various taxes that were favorable to the American colonists?
statuscvo [17]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

They taxed the American Colonists and they had to revolt and boycott buying what the townshend acts taxed.

Have a good day :D and if you liked my answer mark me brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
Which event led to the siege of Yorktown?
andrew11 [14]
Can we see the opotions plz?
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did european exploration change the nature of the world economy after 1480 or so? where was europe most successful in its pe
VladimirAG [237]

The European age of exploration completed change the world for the next 500 years. The new world was discovered by European powers, resulting in complete cultural, religious and political shifts in the Western hemisphere.

Europe itself was successful in the early penetation of the New World and later by building trade links and colonies all over the world including, South Asia, South East Asia, Africa, Near East, Middle East and Australia.

They were able to develop a huge slave trade, which gave them the money and power to expand beyound Europe.

However, they were least successful against great powers like Russia and could not maintain control over the New World for long.

5 0
3 years ago
What did Marqués de Rubí mean when he told Spain there was a difference between the amount of land they occupied and the amount
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

:)

Explanation:

He meant that there was a limit of land Spain had the ability it could control, rather than the amount it could actually be successful controlling, instead of it falling apart.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Define the sixteenth amendment and how did it help the government
    5·1 answer
  • What were the steps in the process of mummification?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was the United States resentful of England during the Industrial Revolution?
    11·2 answers
  • What's expressed powers show that the framers which Congress to have the power to secure the nation against foreign danger
    5·1 answer
  • Describe how cold war tensions were intensified by the space race
    5·1 answer
  • What was Illinois before it became a state
    14·1 answer
  • Briefly explain one historical event that lead to the conclusion of the civil war
    5·1 answer
  • Which group joined the anti-Catholic campaign against presidential candidate Al Smith? PLEASE I NEED HELP
    15·1 answer
  • What are some of Cupid's physical traits?
    10·1 answer
  • URGENT!!!
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!