Answer:
The percentage rate of growth from 2010 to 2011 is the 1237.3%
Explanation:
The percentage rate or growth for online advertising spend in 2011 compared to 2010 is obtained when calculating the following operations:
1. You must know what is the base figure you want to use to determine the percentage growth. In this case $5.9 Billion is the base figure you will use.
2. You want to know what is the figure with which you will determine the final growth. In this case is $73 billion.
3. You replace the values in the following formula:
percentage rate or growth =(( <u> Final growth figure </u> ) ) x 100
Base figure
percentage rate or growth =(( <u> 73 </u> ) ) x 100
5.9
percentage rate or growth = 12.3728 x 100
percentage rate or growth = 1237.28
4. As you want to round your answer to one percentage place, then you round to .28 to .3 that is the next higher decimal number.
percentage rate or growth = 1237.3%
The current account is used to mark the inflow and outflow of goods and services
Answer: 1,125,000
Explanation:
Break even point simply means when the total cost and the total revenue are equal.
Firstly, we need to calculate the cash related fixed cost for Boise Timber Co. This will be:
= Total fixed cost - Depreciation
= $6,000,000 - (25% × $6,000,000)
= $6,000,000 - (0.25 × $6,000,000)
= $6,000,000 - $1,500,000
= $4,500,000
The cash break-even point will be:
= $4,500,000/$4
= 1,125,000
Answer:
The current price of Hubbard's common stock is <u>$25.50</u>.
Explanation:
This can be calculated using the Gordon growth model (GGM) formula that assumes growth is dividend will be constant as follows:
P = D1/(r - g) ............................ (1)
Where,
P = Current stock price = ?
D1 = Next dividend = D0 * (1 + g) = $1.50 * (1 + 2%) = $1.53
r = required return = 8%, or 0.08
g = growth rate = 2%, or 0.02
Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:
P = $1.53 / (0.08 - 0.02) = $25.50
Therefore, the current price of Hubbard's common stock is <u>$25.50</u>.
Answer:
If the accountants of an organization are to concentrate only on financial information then there will be no advantage. The both party (organization and the accountant) might suffer if this happened.
Moreover, it would be very costly to have two systems rather than one that captures and processes operational facts at the same time as it captures and reports financial facts.
The main disadvantage of this is that accountants would ignore much relevant information about the organization's activities. To the extent that such non-financial information (e.g., market share, customer satisfaction, measures of quality, etc.) is important to management, the value of the accounting function would decline.
Explanation:
